Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1939 )

‘oiwc~~ OF’THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN B”O”rn”ILLLL”. Arr0111.” 0.rw”lL ttllr1,,1*ss .. e 0, ma iraID tb offonr;* you hare tr or riosnlty or xoum- llr o um8to no O?es th e nt the tolloriry~~uor~ Wo hno boon unmblo 8o tind •~ lthorlty with rr- form00 to state pzoporty a8 would lnrtituta an lxoeption to the role th6t 0 p8r8on rhall k proreeuted in the oounty rhero thr offonclew.8 ooadttod. thr lolloming lrtiolor 0r the Cob. of Grl~4nrl Rrooodure rpperr to oontrol the tonne ei the otiuua a8 stated above without dlstiaetion udo ktrrrn rtak pnt- pertp mid that $olon&g to 8ny I.ndirldorll "Art. 190. on the boandar~ of two lount%o~. a:. _~ ~83 0r m8el0dttea 01th 1 eb 0wr r yo r b r ptr ,0 oountles, or within Sour hundred yordo thereof, ray be promouted and punlrhul in llther oounty.* *Art. LOO. R*oolVlng on6 eonollolin~ ltoloa propsrtx. ReOolrhIg 8nd OOAOOO~ing otolen gropr- ty arsy be proseouted in the bounty when the thofi XGO oonlttod, or in any other county through or into rhlob the property MJ hare beo;;;;m:yby the perron ltoo)lng the ooao, or: wharo the mame uy have km. reoa’f”wed or. oonoralo4 by the oifwlore* In+loonfth e obore l utb o r ltlo 7mi o ore,reopoot- tu11y w.lvl8*4 that it ir thr opinion0r thio dbpwtmant thet l oompldnt oher&iag one rltb reoelrlaa 8tolm property belong- lq to the #tote, would hare to br film4 in the lounty oooord- lq to the proviolono or Art1010 BOO, 0040 of Or*01 -Fro- oeauro, 1985. Trrrrlo dounty would hero no Jur$rdlotla, of luoh o n0tr w00 ulllo th r r elteto’o Qr o p wty wa ultolon in, or wno oarried through or rooelvd or oonoerled by the offender in oald oounty. TrustioE the lbwo 8navm-a your guestion, we roPaln YOurB tsq truly APfROVSD JULY 10, 1939 o/ w. Y. xooro -3 ASSIsTAMTATN@iEX O$l@H&