Inapplicability of the Federal Vacancies Reform Act's Reporting Requirements When PAS Officers Serve Under Statutory Holdover Provisions ( 1999 )


Menu:
  •       Inapplicability of the Federal Vacancies Reform Act’s
    Reporting Requirements When PAS Officers Serve Under
    Statutory Holdover Provisions
    There is no “ vacancy” within the meaning of the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998 when a
    presidentially appointed, Senate-confirmed officer continues to hold a position under a statutory
    holdover provision. Therefore, the holdover service is not reportable under the Act.
    July 30, 1999
    M e m o r a n d u m O p in io n f o r t h e G e n e r a l C o u n s e l
    O f f ic e o f M a n a g e m e n t a n d B u d g e t
    We recently received two inquires that raised the question whether service of
    a presidentially appointed, Senate-confirmed (“ PAS” ) officer under a statutory
    holdover provision is reportable as a vacancy under the Federal Vacancies Reform
    Act of 1998 ( “ Vacancies Reform Act” or “ Act” ). As discussed below, we have
    concluded that holdover service is not a vacancy for purposes of the Act and
    therefore is not reportable. We wanted to inform you of our conclusion to facilitate
    a uniform approach among the executive agencies on the reporting of this informa­
    tion. Because the Act is somewhat confusing on the point, however, we also would
    strongly urge (and the White House Counsel’s Office concurs) that you notify
    the General Accounting Office that the Administration is not reporting holdover
    positions as vacancies.
    Statutory holdover provisions provide for an officer appointed for a term of
    years to continue to serve in the office at the expiration of the term for which
    he or she was appointed. In some cases that period is open-ended — statutorily
    defined as continuing until a successor is appointed. In other cases, the period
    continues until either a successor is appointed or a specific period of time has
    expired. In either case, the PAS officer’s term in the office continues until the
    expiration o f the statutorily defined holdover period.
    As a matter of constitutional law, the executive branch consistently has taken
    the position that there is a vacancy for purposes of the Recess Appointments
    Clause when an appointment for a term of years expires and the officer continues
    serving under a holdover provision.1 There is, however, no necessary correspond­
    ence between the meaning of a “ vacancy” for purposes of the Recess Appoint­
    1 Judicial decisions on the issue have been mixed. Compare Staebler v Carter, 
    464 F. Supp. 585
    , 588-601 (D.D C.
    1979) (holding that a Federal Election Commission ( “ FEC” ) office was vacant for Recess Appointments Clause
    purposes when the incumbent continued to exercise authority pursuant to a holdover provision that provided that
    “ [a] m em ber o f the [FEC] may serve on the Commission after the expiration of his term until his successor has
    taken office” ) with M ackie v. Clinton, 
    827 F. Supp. 56
    , 58 (D.D.C. 1993) (whether a vacancy exists for Recess
    Appointments Clause purposes depends on th e wording and structure of the particular holdover provision, deciding
    that the Postal Service holdover provision did not create a vacancy), vacated as moot. No 93-5287, 93-5289, 1994
    W L 163761 (D C . C ir Mar. 9, 1994)
    178
    Applicability o f the Federal Vacancies Reform A c t’s Reporting Requirements to Statutory Holdovers
    ments Clause and the meaning of a “ vacancy” as used in a statute, such as the
    Vacancies Reform Act.
    Under the Vacancies Reform Act, a “ vacancy” occurs when a PAS officer
    “ dies, resigns, or is otherwise unable to perform the functions and duties of the
    office.” 
    5 U.S.C. § 3345
    (a) (Supp. IV 1998). This is a narrower idea of a vacancy
    than is applicable in the context of the Recess Appointments Clause. It is, as
    well, a definition that is not, by its terms, applicable to an officer serving under
    a statutory holdover provision. Under a holdover provision, the Senate-confirmed
    officer continues to serve in the office and therefore has not died, resigned, or
    become unable to perform the functions and duties of the office.
    In addition, the Vacancies Reform Act provides, in a separate section specifi­
    cally addressing service under a holdover provision, that the Act is not intended
    to affect the service of a PAS officer under such a provision:
    Sections 3345 through 3349a shall not be construed to affect any
    statute that authorizes a person to continue to serve in any office —
    (1) after the expiration of the term for which such person
    is appointed; and
    (2) until a successor is appointed or a specified period of
    time has expired.
    5 U.S.C. § 3349b (Supp. IV 1998). As a result, we believe that there is no vacancy
    to be reported under the Act when a PAS officer continues service under a hold­
    over provision.
    Although we believe that this is the proper understanding of the Act,
    § 3345(c)(2) makes what would otherwise be a clear result somewhat less clear.
    Section 3345(c)(2) provides that “ [f]or purposes of this section and sections 3346,
    3347, 3348, 3349, 3349a, and 3349d, the expiration of a term of office is an
    inability to perform the functions and duties of such office.” Viewed in isolation,
    this provision could be interpreted to extend the definition of a vacancy to cover
    service under a holdover provision. Section 3345(c)(2), however, must be inter­
    preted in light of the purpose of § 3345(c) as a whole, and, as so interpreted,
    it does not alter the conclusion provided by examining the other provisions of
    the Act.2
    Section 3345(c) was added as a late amendment to the Act for the purpose
    of creating an additional class of acting officers for a specific, narrow situation:
    officers holding fixed terms with no holdover provision who are renominated to
    2 The other pari o f section 3345(c) is subsection (c)(1), which provides.
    Notwithstanding subsection (a)(1), the President (and only the President) may direct an officer who is
    nominated by the President for reappointment for an additional term to the same office in an Executive
    department without a break in service, to continue to serve in that office subject to the time limitations
    in section 3346, until such time as the Senate has acted to confirm or reject the nomination, notwithstanding
    adjournment sine die.
    179
    Opinions o f the Office o f Legal Counsel in Volume 23
    the office. See 144 Cong. Rec. S12,823 (daily ed. Oct. 21, 1998) (statement of
    Sen. Thompson) (“ New § 3345(c) was added to address the special case of an
    executive department (not executive agency) officer who serves not at the pleasure
    of the President, but under a fixed term, and without a holdover provision that
    governs acting service in that office following expiration of the fixed term.”
    (emphasis added)). Section 3345(c) was not intended to, and does not, supplant
    or alter the specific statement in § 3349b that the Act does not affect service under
    a statutory holdover provision.3
    For these reasons, we believe that when an officer serves under a holdover
    provision, there is no reportable vacancy under the Act.
    BETH NOLAN
    Deputy Assistant Attorney General
    Office o f Legal Counsel
    3 Section 3345(c) refers to “ the expiration o f a term o f office," and § 3349b refers to “ the expiration o f the
    term for which such person is appointed.” T h e different phrases convey different meanings. As we discussed above,
    § 3345(c)(2) was meant to apply to situations in which there is no holdover provision and was not intended to
    supplant or alter the clear statement in § 3349b that the Act does not affect service under a holdover provision.
    But to the extent § 3345(c)(2) encompasses positions with holdover provisions, its reference to a term of office
    would sensibly include the full period of service in the office, including the holdover period Section 3349b, on
    the other hand, refers to ‘‘the expiration o f the term fo r which such person is appointed" (emphasis added) when
    it unquestionably intends to exclude the holdover period. This is the term o f years designated as the term of appoint­
    ment in the statute governing appointment to the position See, e.g., 28 U.S C. §541 (b) (1994) (‘‘Each United States
    attorney shall be appointed for a term o f fo u r years On the expiration of his term, a United States attorney shall
    continue to perform the duties o f his office until his successor is appointed and qualifies.” )
    180
    

Document Info

Filed Date: 7/30/1999

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/29/2017