The People v. Nyland CA3 ( 2013 )


Menu:
  • Filed 9/26/13 P. v. Nyland CA3
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
    California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
    publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
    or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
    IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
    THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
    (Calaveras)
    ----
    THE PEOPLE,                                                                                  C072923
    Plaintiff and Respondent,                                    (Super. Ct. Nos. 11F5198 &
    12F5623)
    v.
    JON L. NYLAND,
    Defendant and Appellant.
    Appointed counsel for defendant Jon L. Nyland has asked this court to review the
    record to determine whether there exist any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende
    (1979) 
    25 Cal.3d 436
     (Wende).) We will order a mandatory fee imposed as to each of his
    two cases and affirm the judgment as modified.
    BACKGROUND
    Calaveras County Case No. 11F5198
    In the early morning hours of July 3, 2011, law enforcement officers observed
    defendant speeding and driving erratically. The officers pulled their car behind him and
    activated their emergency lights; defendant sped off and then pulled into a parking lot.
    He got out of the vehicle and was met by Officer Chris Adams.
    1
    Defendant admitted to drinking seven beers within an hour of being stopped by
    Adams. Defendant failed a field sobriety test; his blood-alcohol content was later
    determined to be 0.15 percent. A search of defendant’s car revealed three open bottles of
    hard liquor, 2.72 grams of methamphetamine and drug paraphernalia.
    The following day, California Highway Patrol Officer D. Miller was sent to the
    scene of a single vehicle accident. Officer Miller arrived at the scene and found
    defendant sitting in a lawn chair next to the vehicle; defendant admitted to driving the
    vehicle. Defendant’s blood-alcohol content was .23 percent.
    Defendant was subsequently charged in case No. 11F5198 with possessing
    methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a)), possessing drug
    paraphernalia (Health & Saf. Code, § 11364, subd. (a)), two counts of driving under the
    influence (DUI) with three prior convictions for DUI (Veh. Code, §§ 23152, subd. (a) &
    23550), two counts of driving with a blood-alcohol content at or above .08 percent,
    having three prior DUI convictions (Veh. Code, §§ 23152, subd. (b) & 23550), two
    counts of driving without a valid license (Veh. Code, § 12500, subd. (a)), and driving
    with an open alcoholic beverage container (Veh. Code, § 23226).
    Calaveras County Case No. 12F5623
    During the early morning hours on October 6, 2012, Calaveras County Sheriff’s
    Department received a complaint regarding a physical altercation in a private residence.
    Outside the residence, the deputies saw the victim walking toward them from a
    neighbor’s house.
    As the victim approached them, the deputies noted dried blood on her neck and
    clothing. She told the deputies that defendant arrived at her home around 4:00 a.m. and
    began banging on the sliding glass door. The victim let defendant in, and defendant
    began yelling, “Where is he? Where is he?” Defendant then struck the victim in the head
    with a closed fist, then with a flashlight. The victim ran to the neighbor’s for help; she
    was later taken to the hospital by ambulance. Defendant was ordered from the residence
    2
    at gunpoint. In searching the home, deputies found a double barreled Remington shotgun
    and a Colt M-4 rifle, .22 caliber, along with several “handmade stabbing weapons.”
    Defendant was later charged in case No. 12F5198 with inflicting corporal injury
    on a cohabitant (Pen. Code, § 273.5, subd. (a)) and being a felon in possession of a
    firearm (Pen. Code, § 29800, subd. (a)(1)). It was further alleged that defendant served a
    prior prison term pursuant to Penal Code section 667.5, subdivision (b).
    Resolution of Both Cases
    Defendant resolved both cases together by plea, pleading no contest to inflicting
    corporal injury on a cohabitant and admitted serving a prior prison term as well as no
    contest to driving with a blood-alcohol content at or above .08 percent, with three prior
    DUI convictions. In exchange for his plea, the People agreed to dismiss the balance of
    the two charging documents. Defendant agreed to serve an aggregate term of four years
    and eight months in state prison.
    Defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea. The trial court ordered
    defendant to pay various fines and fees and awarded him eight days of custody credit in
    case No. 11F5198 and an additional 89 days in case No. 12F5623.
    Defendant appeals; his request for a certificate of probable cause was denied.
    DISCUSSION
    Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this
    court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal.
    (Wende, supra, 
    25 Cal.3d 436
    .) Counsel advised defendant of his right to file a
    supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. 30 days have
    passed and we have received no filing from defendant.
    Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error
    that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant. However, we conclude
    the judgment must be modified to include imposition of an omitted mandatory fee.
    3
    The trial court failed to orally impose the mandatory criminal facilities assessment
    (Gov. Code, § 70373) in the amount of $30 for each case, for a total of $60. This fee is
    likewise omitted from the abstracts of judgment. We shall modify the judgment to
    include the fee and direct the trial court to amend the abstracts of judgment accordingly.
    (See People v. Talibdeen (2002) 
    27 Cal.4th 1151
    , 1157.)
    DISPOSITION
    The judgments in both cases are modified to impose a $30 court facilities
    assessment (Gov. Code, § 70373). As modified, the judgments are affirmed. The trial
    court is directed to prepare amended abstracts of judgment and forward certified copies to
    the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.
    DUARTE                     , J.
    We concur:
    BLEASE                     , Acting P. J.
    HOCH                       , J.
    4
    

Document Info

Docket Number: C072923

Filed Date: 9/26/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014