Centerbank v. Gall, No. Cv93 30 96 24 S (Aug. 7, 1995) , 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 8992 ( 1995 )


Menu:
  • [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]RULINGRE: OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT'S REQUEST TO AMEND (#135) The plaintiff's objection to the defendant's request to amend is sustained. The "set-off" is not a set off. It is a counterclaim. The allegations of the counterclaim are the same as those previously set forth in a counterclaim which was withdrawn in response to a motion to strike. The issues presented in the motion to strike were briefed by the plaintiff. The motion was argued before the court (Maiocco, J.). The court filed a memorandum of decision addressing those issues which were not withdrawn.

    THIM, JUDGE

Document Info

Docket Number: No. CV93 30 96 24 S

Citation Numbers: 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 8992

Judges: THIM, JUDGE.

Filed Date: 8/7/1995

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021