Julian Puente Rodriguez v. State ( 2008 )


Menu:
  •                             NUMBER 13-08-00399-CR
    COURT OF APPEALS
    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
    ______________________________________________________________
    JULIAN PUENTE RODRIGUEZ,                                                    Appellant,
    v.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                  Appellee.
    _____________________________________________________________
    On appeal from the 103rd District Court
    of Cameron County, Texas.
    ______________________________________________________________
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices Yanez, Garza, and Vela
    Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
    Appellant, Julian Puente Rodriguez, attempted to perfect an appeal from a
    conviction for aggravated sexual assault. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
    Sentence in this matter was imposed on March 10, 2006. No motion for new trial
    was filed. Notice of appeal was filed on June 17, 2008. On June 25, 2008, the Clerk of
    this Court notified appellant that it appeared that the appeal was not timely perfected.
    Appellant was advised that the appeal would be dismissed if the defect was not corrected
    within ten days from the date of receipt of the Court’s directive. Appellant has not
    responded to this notice.
    Unless a motion for new trial has been timely filed, a notice of appeal must be filed
    within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court, or after
    the day the trial court enters an appealable order. TEX . R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). Where a
    timely motion for new trial has been filed, the notice of appeal must be filed within ninety
    days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court. See 
    id. 26.2(a)(2). The
    time within which to file the notice may be enlarged if, within fifteen days after the
    deadline for filing the notice, the party files the notice of appeal and a motion complying
    with Rule 10.5(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See 
    id. 26.3. Appellant’s
    notice of appeal, filed more than twenty-six months after sentence was
    imposed, was untimely, and accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over the appeal. See 
    Slaton, 981 S.W.2d at 210
    . Appellant may be entitled to an out-of-time appeal by filing a
    post-conviction writ of habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals;
    however, the availability of that remedy is beyond the jurisdiction of this Court. See TEX .
    CODE CRIM . PROC . ANN . art. 11.07, § 3(a) (Vernon 2005); see also Ex parte Garcia, 
    988 S.W.2d 240
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1999).
    The appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.
    PER CURIAM
    Do not publish. See TEX . R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
    Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
    this the 20th day of November, 2008.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-08-00399-CR

Filed Date: 11/20/2008

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/11/2015