United States v. Micah E. Tyson , 104 F. App'x 606 ( 2004 )


Menu:
  •                     United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 03-4038
    ___________
    United States of America,                *
    *
    Plaintiff-Appellee,          *
    *
    v.                                 *    Appeal from the United States
    *    District Court for the Western
    Micah E. Tyson,                          *    District of Missouri.
    *
    Defendant-Appellant.         *       [UNPUBLISHED]
    ___________
    Submitted: July 22, 2004
    Filed: August 12, 2004
    ___________
    Before MELLOY, LAY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    This matter comes before the court for review on the ground that the district
    court, in revoking Defendant’s probation, imposed a sentence above that
    recommended by the Guidelines. See United States Sentencing Commission,
    Guidelines Manual, § 7B1.4(a) (Nov. 2002). Defendant’s counsel has sought
    permission to withdraw and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967), alleging the ground upon which the Defendant appeals.
    The district court articulated the reasons for imposing a sentence above the
    recommended Guidelines range, and we find no abuse of discretion in this regard.
    See United States v. Brown, 
    203 F.3d 557
    , 558-59 (8th Cir. 2000). This court has
    also reviewed the record of the district court in accordance with Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
     (1988), and finds no nonfrivolous issues. The district court is affirmed. See
    8th Cir. R. 47B.
    We also grant defense counsel’s motion to withdraw. Counsel is reminded of
    the obligations under Part V of this Court’s Amended Criminal Justice Act Plan.
    Specifically, counsel is to advise the defendant of the right to file a petition for writ
    of certiorari in the Supreme Court of the United States, and to inform the defendant
    as to the merits and likelihood of success in the filing of such a petition. If counsel
    determines there are meritorious issues, defense counsel shall assist the defendant in
    filing a petition for writ of certiorari. If counsel determines there are no meritorious
    issues warranting the filing of a petition for writ of certiorari, counsel shall advise the
    defendant of the procedures for filing a petition pro se, and the time limits for the
    filing of such a petition. Counsel shall file a certification with the clerk within 30
    days certifying that he has complied with his obligations under Part V.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-4038

Citation Numbers: 104 F. App'x 606

Filed Date: 8/12/2004

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/13/2015