Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1989 )


Menu:
  •                       February 23, 1989
    Honorable David R. White, Jr.       OpiniOn   No.   JR-1019
    County Attorney
    120 East North Street               Re: Salary of commission-
    Uvalde, Texas 78801                 ers in Uvalde County, and
    related questions (RQ-1585)
    Dear Mr. White:
    You ask the following questions:
    1. Can the salary paid each   [county]
    Commissioner  be different or must   each
    receive the same salary?
    2. Can the salary of the Commissioners be
    lowered by a vote of the Commissioners Court?
    If so, can the Budget be amended,       after
    proper hearing,  immediately to reflect the
    vote of the Commissioners, or would the Court
    have to wait until their yearly        budget
    hearings?
    3. If the salary of the Commissioners can
    be lowered by the vote of the Commissioners
    Court, what is the lowest amount that can be
    paid each Commissioner as allowed by law?
    4. Can a Commissioner elect to receive a
    salary lower than what     is set by     the
    Commissioners Court?
    5. Can a Commissioner    receive his full
    salary, and thereafter make a donation     or
    gift back to the County of a portion thereof?
    In your first question you ask whether      all county
    commissioners must receive the same salary. Section 152.011
    of the Local Government  Code provides "[t]he commissioners
    court of     a  county shall    set   the ,amount   of   the
    p. 5258
    Honorable David R. White, Jr. - Page 2    (JM-1019)
    compensation . . . for county and precinct officers."    See
    article XVI, section 61 of the Texas Constitution.   Section
    152.012 of the Local Government Code provides      that the
    salary of an officer may not be set at an amount less than
    the amount of the salary in effect on January 1, 1972.
    In Attorney General Opinion JM-770 (1987), it was found
    that the commissioners   court may provide    for different
    salaries   for  constables   in   each   precinct    if   the
    circumstances reasonably require  different salaries  and  if
    each salary is itself reasonable.
    In White v. Comm's Court of Kimble County, 
    705 S.W.2d 322
    , 326 (Tex. App. - San Antonio, 1986, no writ), it was
    noted that "the case law is clear that the commissioners
    court is limited only to providing      a reasonable    salary
    within their discretion for  county
    _ _public officials."    See
    Vondv v.  Comm8s Court  of Uvalde   County, 
    620 S.W.2d 104
    ,
    108-109 (Tex. 1981).
    While White addressed  the salary of a justice of the
    peace and the issue in Vondv related to compensation for a
    constable, no reason is perceived why the same standard
    should not be applied   in setting the salary of a county
    commissioner.
    As to whether salaries of all commissioners must be the
    same, it should be noted that the duties of a constable       or
    justice of the peace are more confined to the official's
    precinct than are the duties of a county commissioner        and
    that therefore payment of different salaries to the former
    officials might     reasonably    correspond   to    some   such
    officials'  duties being      more extensive    than    others'.
    Article V, section 18 of the Texas Constitution grants       the
    county commissioners   court l'such powers and jurisdiction
    over all county business, as is conferred by this Constitu-
    tion and the laws of the State." Section 81.006 of the
    Local Government Code requires three members of the court to
    be present   for conducting   county business except that a
    county tax may be levied only when at least four members are
    present.   While the commissioners       sit as a body        in
    conducting the business of the county,       in those counties
    where commissioners   are ex officio road commissioner        of
    their respective   precincts,   section 3.001(a) of article
    6702-1, V.T.C.S., imposes duties on a commissioner for road
    and bridge construction and maintenance in his precinct.
    Conceivably, there could be a substantial      variance in the
    responsibilities of the commissioners in connection         rSith
    their duties as ex officio road commissioner.         In such a
    rare instance it might be urged that a reasonable salary for
    p. 5259
    Honorable David R. White, Jr. - Page 3     (JM-1019)
    one commissioner may differ from that of another depending
    upon a marked disparity in these duties.      In the final
    analysis, as was concluded    in Attorney General Opinion
    JM-770, what constitutes a reasonable salary is a question
    of fact within the discretion of the commissioners court.
    In your second question you ask whether a salary can be
    lowered for a county commissioner.      The salary may be
    lowered at the discretion   of the court.    However,  under
    section 152.013 of the Local Government   Code, the commis-
    sioners court is without authority to lower the salary of a
    county or precinct officer until the regular annual budget
    hearing. See Attorney General Opinion JM-839 (1988).
    In response to your third question, the salary may not
    be lowered to an amount less than the amount of salary   in
    effect on January 1, 1972. Local Gov't Code 5 152.012.
    In your fourth question you ask whether a commissioner
    may elect to receive a salary lower than that set by the
    commissioners court.   Section  151.011 provides   that the
    commissioners court shall set the amount of compensation for
    county and precinct officers. It is not within the province
    of a commissioner to determine that his salary differ   from
    the amount set by the court.1
    In your last question you     ask if a commissioner after
    receiving his salary may make      a gift to the county of a
    portion thereof.
    1. We call attention to section 152.052 of the Local
    Government Code regarding the decision of an official not to
    be paid.
    (a) If an elected county officer files an
    affidavit with the county clerk stating that
    the officer elects not to be paid for the
    officer's  services,   the   county   payroll
    officer may not issue a paycheck to the
    officer.
    (b) After the affidavit    is filed, the
    county payroll officer shall take measures to
    stop payment of a paycheck that was issued to
    the officer before the affidavit was filed
    and that has not been presented for payment.
    P. 5260
    Honorable David R. White, Jr. - Page 4        (JM-1019)
    Article XI, section 1 of the Texas Constitution  states
    that counties  are legal subdivisions   of the state.    The
    Interpretive Commentary notes that since counties are agents
    of the state, they have no powers except those which are set
    forth in the constitution and statutes. 
    Id. In Attorney
     General Opinion JM-684    (1987), it was
    stated that "in order that a state agency may accept a gift,
    it first must be authorized by law to do so; absent such
    authority, it may not accept gifts or donations."2       The
    Legislature  has not seen fit to confer authority upon a
    county to accept a donation    from a county commissioner.
    Generally, a county is not empowered to exercise any power
    which is not specifically authorized by the legislature,  or
    which may be reasonably   inferred from a specific power.
    Canales v. Lauahlin, 
    214 S.W.2d 451
    (Tex. 1948).
    We presume that all parties are acting in the public
    interest. Nevertheless,   absent an authorization  by the
    legislature permitting an official to donate a portion of
    his salary to the county, we conclude that a county
    commissioner may not give a portion of his salary to the
    county.
    SUMMARY
    Commissioners   courts   may   prescribe
    different salaries for the commissioners   of
    different precincts if unusual circumstances
    . in each precinct reasonably require different
    salaries and each     salary is in     itself
    2.    In Attorney General Opinion JM-684, it was noted:
    The legislature has explicitly      conferred
    such authority   on several state agencies.
    See e.a    V.T.C.S.   arts. 4413d-1 (Office of
    State-Federal   Relations):   4413(32f)    (Texas
    Closeup Board); 4413(35) (Commission on Fire
    Protection   Personnel Standards     and Educa-
    tion): 4413(44)     (Governor's Commission     on
    Physical Fitness): 4413(47d) (Texas National
    Research   Laboratory   Commission):    4413(49)
    (Criminal Justice    Policy Council:    Criminal
    Justice    Coordinating    Council):    4413(51)
    (Interagency Council on Sex Offender Treat-
    ment).
    P. 5261
    P
    Honorable David R. White, Jr. - Page 5    (JM-1019)
    reasonable.  What constitutes    a reasonable
    salary is a question of fact within        the
    discretion of the court. Section 152.012 of
    the Local Government   Code provides that the
    salary of an official may not be set at an
    amount lower than the amount of the salary in
    effect on January 1, 1972. The commissioners
    court is without authority to lower the
    salary of a county or precinct officer until
    the regular annual budget hearing.   It is not
    within the province of an individual commis-
    sioner  to .determine that his salary differ
    from the amount set by the commissioners
    court. A county commissioner may not make a
    donation of a portion of his salary to the
    county.
    JIM     MATTOX
    Attorney General of Texas
    MARY KELLER
    First Assistant Attorney General
    LOU MCCREARY
    Executive Assistant Attorney General
    JUDGE ZOLLIE STEAKLEY
    Special Assistant Attorney General
    RICK GILPIN
    Chairman, Opinion Committee
    Prepared by Tom G. Davis
    Assistant Attorney General
    p. 5262
    

Document Info

Docket Number: JM-1019

Judges: Jim Mattox

Filed Date: 7/2/1989

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017