Hall v. State , 681 So. 2d 637 ( 1994 )

MONTIEL, Judge,

concurring in part, dissenting in part.

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding in Part I that the crime of possession of cocaine is not a crime involving moral turpitude. I believe that defense counsel should have been allowed to impeach the witness with evidence of his prior conviction for possession of cocaine. Therefore, I dissent from that holding. In all other respects, I concur in the majority’s opinion.