Brooks v. State , 20 Ala. App. 673 ( 1925 )

There was sufficient evidence to make out a case for the state, and therefore the general charge as requested by defendant was properly refused. Charge 11 refused to defendant has misleading tendencies, and its refusal was not error. The rulings of the court upon the admissibility of testimony were free from error. We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.