United States v. Hessam Ghane ( 2004 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 04-1769
    ___________
    United States of America                *
    *
    Appellee,         *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                                * District Court for the
    * Western District of Missouri.
    Hessam Ghane,                           *
    *
    Appellant.         *
    ___________
    Submitted: September 17, 2004
    Filed: December 20, 2004
    ___________
    Before COLLOTON, HEANEY, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    HEANEY, Circuit Judge.
    Hessam Ghane is a 54-year-old naturalized United States citizen of Iranian
    descent who suffers from delusional disorder. On February 4, 2003, Ghane was
    admitted to an Overland Park Hospital emergency room, stating that he was suicidal
    because he was depressed and out of work. He told a physician’s assistant that he
    intended to kill himself using a solid form of cyanide, which he had acquired through
    his years as a chemist, and stored in his home. The physician’s assistant notified the
    Independence, Missouri Police Department, and detectives were sent to interview
    Ghane, who consented to a search of his home. During the search, a bottle half-filled
    with white powder was found under Ghane’s kitchen sink. The powder was later
    determined to be bicarbonate and seventy-five percent potassium cyanide. Ghane
    stated he did not know it was illegal to possess potassium cyanide, and claimed he
    intended to use it in teaching, to conduct experiments, or to commit suicide. He was
    charged with criminal possession of potassium cyanide, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§
    229(a)(1) and 229A(a)(1).
    On October 30, 2003, the court held a competency hearing and determined that
    Ghane was incompetent to stand trial. The magistrate conducted a Sell1 hearing on
    January 12, 2004 and ordered Ghane to be involuntarily medicated with antipsychotic
    medications in order to restore him to competency to stand trial. The magistrate
    found that the recommended treatment is substantially likely to render Ghane capable
    of standing trial because medical testimony indicated there was a ten percent chance
    of success. Ghane appeals this order.
    Appellate review of a district court’s findings of fact is for clear error. United
    States v. Cook, 
    356 F.3d 913
    , 918 (8th Cir. 2004). An individual has a
    constitutionally protected liberty interest in rejecting or avoiding the administration
    of antipsychotic medications. Washington v. Harper, 
    494 U.S. 210
    , 221-22 (1990).
    Before the court may authorize the involuntary administration of antipsychotic
    medication for the purpose of rendering Ghane competent to stand trial, the
    government must show: (1) important government interests are at stake; (2)
    involuntary medication is substantially likely to render the defendant competent to
    stand trial, and substantially unlikely to have side effects that will interfere
    significantly with the defendant’s ability to assist counsel at trial; (3) involuntary
    medication is necessary to further the government’s interests, and less intrusive
    means are unlikely to achieve substantially the same results; and (4) the
    administration of the drugs is medically appropriate. See 
    Sell, 539 U.S. at 180-182
    .
    Neither the Supreme Court nor our circuit has spoken on the standard of proof that
    1
    Sell v. United States, 
    539 U.S. 166
    (2003).
    -2-
    attaches to Sell proceedings. In United States v. Gomes, 
    387 F.3d 157
    , 160 (2nd Cir.
    2004), the Second Circuit determined that a clear and convincing standard should
    apply. Ghane asks us to use the preponderance of the evidence standard, and the
    district court applied a lesser standard. We need not determine which to use in this
    case, however, because each of the standards would yield the same result: the
    government has failed to sustain its burden.
    The second and fourth Sell factors are at issue here: is the involuntary
    administration of antipsychotic medication substantially likely to render Ghane
    competent to stand trial; and is the administration of an increased dosage of
    antipsychotic medication medically appropriate? The magistrate made the following
    findings about Ghane’s psychotic disorder after considering testimony from at least
    four psychiatrists:
    Delusional disorder is characterized by the presence of one or
    more fixed, nonbizarre, and unvarying delusions. Patients with
    delusional disorder do not experience hallucinations or disorders
    of thinking or perception. Rather, they maintain delusions, or false
    beliefs, despite any amount of evidence to contradict those beliefs.
    The delusions are “nonbizarre,” meaning they involve events or
    situations that could conceivably occur in real life, rather than
    supernatural agents or phenomena. In the Persecutory Type of
    delusional disorder, individuals typically believe they are being
    conspired against, spied on, poisoned or drugged, or otherwise
    persecuted.
    Delusional disorder resists treatment by both psychotherapy and
    antipsychotic medication. Patients with delusional disorder are
    fully intact individuals, and the delusions themselves are not
    indicative of a thought disorder. The delusions are a fixed part of
    the individual’s thought pattern, and, except in the mildest cases,
    they cannot be convinced through behavioral therapy to ignore the
    delusional beliefs or to recognize their falsity. Antipyschotic
    medication is similarly ineffective at treating delusional disorder.
    -3-
    Approximately 10 percent of patients who receive antipsychotic
    drugs experience a lessening of symptoms or remission. Of that 10
    percent, about half, or 5 percent, are symptom-free after treatment.
    The remainder are considered “improved,” meaning the patients are
    less preoccupied with their delusions, either because the delusions
    appear in the past tense or because they are able to adopt a
    behavioral stance of acting as though the delusions are false.
    Ninety percent of delusional disorder patients do not experience
    improvement with treatment.
    United States v. Ghane, No. 03-00171-01-CR-W-ODS, slip op. at 5 (D. Mo. Feb. 12,
    2004) (Report and Recommendation on Government’s Sell Mot.) (Citations omitted)
    (Emphasis added). On the basis of these facts, the court below determined that
    involuntarily medicating Ghane was substantially likely to restore his competency.
    We cannot accept that a “glimmer of hope” for his restored competence rises to the
    level of “substantial likelihood,” as mandated by the Supreme Court’s holding in Sell.
    A five to ten percent chance of restored competence cannot be considered
    substantially likely under any circumstances.2 It was error for the court below to
    hold that the government had met its burden in establishing the second Sell factor.
    We therefore reverse the district court.
    ______________________________
    2
    Compare 
    Gomes, 387 F.3d at 161-62
    (finding that a seventy percent success
    rate in restoring defendant’s competence through drug treatment was substantially
    likely to render Gomes competent and substantially unlikely to have disabling side
    effects).
    -4-