Andrew Straw v. United States ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                  United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
    ____________
    No. 22-5106                                                September Term, 2021
    1:22-cv-00118-UNA
    Filed On: June 23, 2022
    Andrew U.D. Straw, Esquire,
    Appellant
    v.
    United States of America,
    Appellee
    ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
    BEFORE: Rao and Walker, Circuit Judges, and Sentelle, Senior Circuit Judge
    JUDGMENT
    This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court
    for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P.
    34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). Upon consideration of the foregoing, the notice in lieu of
    reply brief, and the Rule 28(j) letter, it is
    ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s March 7, 2022 order
    dismissing the case and April 6, 2022 order denying reconsideration be affirmed. The
    Federal Tort Claims Act does not waive the United States’ sovereign immunity for
    claims brought by children of servicemen for service-connected injuries. Lombard v.
    United States, 
    690 F.2d 215
     (D.C. Cir. 1982). Moreover, appellant has not shown any
    abuse of discretion in the district court’s denial of reconsideration. See Smalls v. United
    States, 
    471 F.3d 186
    , 191 (D.C. Cir. 2006). Appellant asks this court to overturn
    Lombard, but a three-judge panel may not overturn a decision of a prior panel of this
    court. See La. Pub. Serv. Comm’n v. FERC, 
    522 F.3d 378
    , 390 (D.C. Cir. 2008).
    United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
    ____________
    No. 22-5106                                                September Term, 2021
    Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk
    is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution
    of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.
    P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.
    Per Curiam
    FOR THE COURT:
    Mark J. Langer, Clerk
    BY:     /s/
    Daniel J. Reidy
    Deputy Clerk
    Page 2