Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1951 )


Menu:
  • Hon. Lloyd A. Wicks,   Jr.   Opinion MO. V-1331
    County Attorney
    Crosby county                Re: Authority of the com-
    Crosbyton, Texas                 mFssionersf couPt to
    call a apeclel election
    on levying a .special
    tax fop the upkeep of
    Dear Sir:                        public cemeteries.,
    You have requested an opinion on the authority
    of the commisslont3rs~court to call an electlon on levy-
    ine a sDeoia1 tax for the maintenance and UDkeeD of Dub-
    lit c&terl8s   in view of House Bill 185, Acts~j2nd ieg-
    lslature, R.S. 1951, oh. 271, p. 437 (Art. 23511, V.C.S.),
    which provides:
    "CommLssloners Courts of the counties
    of this State are hereby authoPFzed to spend
    moneys in the general fund POP the purpose
    of maintenance and upkeep of public cemeter-
    ies in their PespectFve COUntFeS."
    Your letter states that Crosby County is now
    levying the county general tax at the maximum ret8 al-
    lowed by Section 9, Article VIII, COnstitutiOn of Texas.
    The decisions of the T8XaS courts have repeat-
    edly held that the commisslone~s~ court is a court of
    limited jurisdiction and has only such powers 8s ape
    conferred upon it, eith8P by express terms OP by neces-
    sary ImplFcatFon, by the Constitution and statutes of
    this State. Childress County v. State, 
    127 Tex. 343
    ,
    
    92 S.W.2d 1011
    (1936); Von Rosenberg v. Lovett, 
    173 S.W. 508
    (Tex. CFv. App. 1915, err-or ref )*
    
    280 S.W. 289
    Tex. Civ. App. 1925);'Ai.t
    11 Tex. JUP. A32, Countles, Sec. 95.
    Although Rouse Bill 185 authorizes the main-
    tenance and upkeep of public cemeteries, It contains no
    provision authorizing a levy of special tax therefor.
    While the Legislature might have made the authority of
    the commissioners' court to spend moneys in the general
    Eon. Lloyd A. Wicks, Jr., page 2   (v-1331)
    fund for this purpose condFtiona1 upon a favorable vote
    of the taxpaying voters of the county, it could not have
    authorized the leving of a special tax In addition to
    the taxes permitted und8P Section 9 of Article VIII of
    the Constitution. In this instance, the Legislature has
    not PeqUiP8d a vote of the taXpayePS as a pPeP8quisite
    to the expenditure of moneys for the maintenance and up-
    k88p of public cemeteries and has specifically provided
    that these expenses are to be paid out of the general
    fund of the county.
    You are therefore advised that the commission-
    ers' court 1s not authorized to call an election for the
    purpose of levying a special tax for th8 maintenance and
    upkeep of public cemeteries.
    The commissioners' court does not have
    authority to call an election to levy a Spe-
    cialtax for maintenance and upkeep of public
    oemeteries. Only the general fund of the
    county may b8 used for such purposes. R. D.
    185, Acts 52nd Leg., R.S. 1951, ch. 271, p.
    437 (Art. 2351f, V.C.S.)
    APPROVED:                           Yours very truly,
    J. C~.Davis,,Jr.                       PRICE DANIEL
    County Affairs Division              Attorney GeIWPal
    J8SSe P. Luton, Jr.
    Reviewing Assistant
    RV8P8tt Rutchinson~
    Executive Assistant                  v     Assistant
    JR:wah
    

Document Info

Docket Number: V-1331

Judges: Price Daniel

Filed Date: 7/2/1951

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017