Muldrow v. State , 439 S.W.3d 46 ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                     Cite as 
    2014 Ark. 333
    SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
    No.   CR-14-274
    Opinion Delivered July 31, 2014
    MICHAEL MULDROW                                   APPELLANT’S PRO SE MOTIONS
    APPELLANT          FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
    BRIEF AND FOR APPOINTMENT
    V.                                                OF COUNSEL
    [HEMPSTEAD COUNTY CIRCUIT
    STATE OF ARKANSAS                                 COURT, NO. 29CR-12-257]
    APPELLEE
    HONORABLE RANDY WRIGHT,
    JUDGE
    APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTIONS
    MOOT.
    PER CURIAM
    On August 5, 2013, judgment was entered in the Hempstead County Circuit Court
    reflecting that appellant Michael Muldrow had entered a negotiated plea of guilty to first-
    degree murder. A sentence of 240 months’ imprisonment was imposed, with an additional
    120 months’ suspended imposition of sentence.
    On November 15, 2013, appellant filed in the trial court a pro se petition for
    postconviction relief pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.1 (2013). The
    petition was dismissed on the ground that it was not timely filed, and appellant lodged an
    appeal in this court from the order. Now before us are appellant’s motions for extension of
    time to file his brief-in-chief and for appointment of counsel. We dismiss the appeal, as it is
    evident from the record that appellant could not succeed on appeal. This court will not
    Cite as 
    2014 Ark. 333
    permit an appeal from an order that denied a petition for postconviction relief to go forward
    where it is clear that the appellant could not prevail. Smith v. State, 
    2013 Ark. 422
    (per
    curiam); Murphy v. State, 
    2013 Ark. 243
    (per curiam). The motions are rendered moot by
    the dismissal of the appeal.
    Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.2(c) requires that, when an appellant entered
    a plea of guilty, a petition under the Rule must be filed in the trial court within ninety days
    of the date of entry of judgment. Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.2(c)(i). Appellant filed his petition 102
    days after the judgment had been entered. The time limitations imposed in Rule 37.2(c) are
    jurisdictional in nature, and, if they are not met, a trial court lacks jurisdiction to grant
    postconviction relief. Ussery v. State, 
    2014 Ark. 186
    (per curiam); Talley v. State, 
    2012 Ark. 314
    (per curiam); Benton v. State, 
    325 Ark. 246
    , 
    925 S.W.2d 401
    (1996) (per curiam). The
    petition before the trial court was not timely filed as to the judgment-and-commitment order;
    thus, the trial court court lacked jurisdiction to grant the relief sought. When the lower court
    lacks jurisdiction, the appellate court also lacks jurisdiction. Green v. State, 
    2014 Ark. 115
    (per
    curiam).
    Appeal dismissed; motions moot.
    Michael Muldrow, pro se appellant.
    No response.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: CR-14-274

Citation Numbers: 2014 Ark. 333, 439 S.W.3d 46

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 7/31/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/31/2023