Joel Withrow and Joel Withrow D/B/A Howard Gin v. Helena Chemical Company ( 2008 )


Menu:
  •   

     

    IN THE

    TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

     

    No. 10-08-00363-CV

     

    Joel Withrow and Joel Withrow

    d/b/a Howard Gin,

                                                                                        Appellants

     v.

     

    Helena Chemical Company,

                                                                                        Appellee

     

       


    From the 40th District Court

    Ellis County, Texas

    Trial Court No. 75290

     

    ABATEMENT ORDER FOR MEDIATION


     

                In their docketing statement filed with this Court on October 23, 2008, appellants request that this appeal be referred to mediation.

            The Legislature has provided for the resolution of disputes through alternative dispute resolution (ADR) procedures. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §§ 154.001-154.073 (Vernon 2005).  The policy behind ADR is stated in the statute: “It is the policy of this state to encourage the peaceable resolution of disputes . . . and the early settlement of pending litigation through voluntary settlement procedures.”  Id. § 154.002 (Vernon 2005).  Mediation is a form of ADR.  Mediation is a mandatory but non-binding settlement conference, conducted with the assistance of a mediator.  Mediation is private, confidential, and privileged.

            We find that this appeal is appropriate for mediation.  See id. § 154.021(a) (Vernon 2005); 10th Tex. App. (Waco) Loc. R. 9.

            The parties are ordered to confer and attempt to agree upon a mediator.  Within fourteen days after the date of this Order, appellants are ordered to file a notice with the Clerk of this Court which either identifies the agreed-upon mediator or states that the parties are unable to agree upon a mediator.  If the notice states that the parties are unable to agree upon a mediator, this Court will assign a mediator.

            Mediation must occur within thirty days after the date the above-referenced notice agreeing to a mediator is filed or, if no mediator is agreed upon, within thirty days after the date of the order assigning a mediator.

            Before the first scheduled mediation session, each party must provide the mediator and all other parties with an information sheet setting forth the party’s positions about the issues that need to be resolved.  At or before the first session, all parties must produce all information necessary for the mediator to understand the issues presented. The mediator may require any party to supplement the information required by this Order.

            Named parties must be present during the entire mediation process, and each corporate party must be represented by a corporate employee, officer, or agent with authority to bind the corporate party to settlement.

            Immediately after mediation, the mediator must advise this Court, in writing, only that the case did or did not settle and the amount of the mediator’s fee paid by each party.  The mediator’s fees will be taxed as costs.  Unless the mediator agrees to mediate without fee, the mediator must negotiate a reasonable fee with the parties, and the parties must each pay one-half of the agreed-upon fee directly to the mediator.

            Failure or refusal to attend the mediation as scheduled may result in the imposition of sanctions, as permitted by law. 

            Any objection to this Order must be filed with this Court and served upon all parties within ten days after the date of this Order, or it is waived.

            We abate this appeal for mediation.

    PER CURIAM

    Before Chief Justice Gray,

            Justice Vance, and

            Justice Reyna

    Order issued and filed November 5, 2008

    Appeal abated for mediation

    Do not publish

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-08-00363-CV

Filed Date: 11/5/2008

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/10/2015