Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1971 )


Menu:
  • Honorable Oscar B. McInnis        Opinion No. M-983
    Criminal,District Attorney
    County Courthouse                 Re:   Whether provisions of
    Edinburg, Texas 78539                   Senate Bill No. 841, Acts
    62nd Legislature, R.S.,
    1971 (Art. 1083, V.A.C.C.P.)
    require collection of court
    costs for the benefit of
    the Criminal Justice Plan-
    ning Fund fin connection
    with convictions for of-
    fenses which occurred prior
    to August 30, 1971, the
    effective date of legis-
    Dear Mr. McInnis:                       lation.
    You have requested the opinion of this office as to the
    following question:
    "Does this new statute [S.B. 8411 require the
    collection of the additional court cost for the
    benefit of the Criminal Justice Planning Fund on
    those cases in which the offenses were committed
    prior to August 30, 1971, the effective date of
    this Act?"
    Your question must be answered in the negative.
    Senate Bill 841 provides, in part:
    "Sec. 3. (a) The Sum of $2.50 shall be taxed
    as costs ,of court, in addition to other taxable
    court costs, upon conviction in each misde-
    meanor case in which original jurisdiction
    lies in courts whose jurisdiction is limited
    to a maximum fine of $200.00 only.
    "Sec. 4.    The sum of $5.00 shall be taxed
    -4796-
    .’   .
    Honorable Oscar B. McInnis, page 2     (M-983)
    as costs of court, in addition to other taxable
    court costs, upon conviction in each misdemeanor
    case and the sum of $10.00 shall be taxed as
    costs of court, in addition to other taxable
    court costs, upon conviction in each felony
    case in all cases in which original jurisdic-
    tion lies in courts whose jurisdiction is li-
    mited to fines and/or confinement in a jail or
    the department of corrections.
    "Sec. 5. The costs due the State under
    this Act shall be collected along with and
    in the same manner as other fines or costs
    are collected in the case."
    It is a well settled principle of law that statutes are
    presumed to operate prospectively unless there is a clear ex-
    pression to the contrary.     53 Tex.Jur.2d 51, Statutes Sec.
    28. Moreover, penal statutes imposing a penalty must be
    strictly construed and the person seeking to recover the
    penalty must bring himself clearly within the terms of the
    statute.   53 Tex.Jur.2d 306, Statutes, Sec. 198. To hold
    otherwise would be in violation of,Article I, Section.16, of
    the Texas Constitution.    See Ex.Parte~Carson, 
    159 S.W.2d 126
     ',X .ChGA-n,.
    1&4V; *;%x PsttL~ Wian., 4FL5E X . CL% ',T%x.pZ,i.!.
    . lA%%',;
    Caldwell v. State, 
    55 Ala. 133
    (1876).
    In view of the foregoing authorities, it is our opinion
    that the additional items of court cost provided by Senate
    Bill 841 cannot be assessed on offenses committed prior to
    August 30, 1971.
    SUMMARY
    Additional court costs under Senate Bill 841
    cannot be assessed on conviction for offenses
    coanaitted prior to Auguat 30, 1971, the effec-
    tive date of the Act since a statute will not
    be applied retroactively with     a clear ex-
    pression to that effect.     ;
    ey General of Texas
    -4797-
    ,
    Honorable Oscar B. McInnis, page 3    (M-983)
    Prepared by Max P. Flusche
    Assistant Attorney General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Kerns Taylor, Chairman
    W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman
    Lonny Zwiener
    Malcom Smith
    Austin Bray
    Camm Lary
    SAM MCDANIEL
    Staff Legal Assistant
    ALFRED WALKER
    Executive Assistant
    NOLA WHITE
    First Assistant
    -4798-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: M-983

Judges: Crawford Martin

Filed Date: 7/2/1971

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017