Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1971 )


Menu:
  •                                 ATIY)RNEY                  GENERAL
    OF%'EXAS
    February       19, 1971
    Hon. Joe Remmber                                     Opinion     No. M-795           t
    County Attorney
    Hard6  county                                         Ror     Whether l poreon who
    HOU6tOn, T6X&6                                                ha6 been convicted ot
    a felony but whoae
    aentenoa has been pro-
    bated.may k.$laued    a
    votq,regis,ft;Stion
    Dear Mr.       Re6WehMl                                       certitioak.       ._.
    .
    In your recent 0 &ion requert ddresred&:;)lii
    office     you ark the~to P lowing questions
    Whether a person who hu ben convicte4 of’
    a felony but.which aentenoe.has been~ robah& auy
    be issued a voter regi8t~@tio&aertif P c&e.-,
    Article VI, Section             1, Conrtikon              of Texa$,     pioVi*des
    in part as follows:
    "The following claeses of person8  Shall
    not be allowed to vote in this state,  to wit:
    l
    .   .   .
    "Fourth:   All person8             convictei3 ot any telony,
    abject     to auah en#ptione              ar the Legirl8ture  may
    make.”                 .
    This constitutional  provision  wu   implemented by. the
    tigfalature   in Article 5.01 of the tkction    Code of the
    State of Texas, which provide8    in pertinent  partr
    “The following classes of persona                  shall
    not   be allowed to vote in this .&ate8
    " . . .
    -   5861.
    Hon.   Joe   Re6weber,   page 2            (M-795)
    “4. All persons convicted   of any felony
    except those restored to full   citizenship
    and right of suffrage or pardoned.”
    Article 42.12 of the Code of Criminal      Procedure of
    Texas deals with probation     in felony ca6e6 and provides~
    authority   for the 6USPending   of sentence6   and the plaoing
    an probakon of defendants      convicted  of felonie~s uhdek Ce*ilih
    prescribed   circumstances.    Section 7 of Article II.12
    orovides:
    “Sec. 1. ht any time, after the defendant
    has sati6factorily      oompleted   one third of the
    original   probationary     period or two years of
    probation;whiohever       is the lesser,     the period.         l* I
    of probation may be reduced or terminated b the
    court.    Upon the saCirtac$ory      tultillment‘o Lb@
    conditions   of probafion,      and the expiration or
    ‘~
    the period or probation,        the court, by order
    duly entered,    sball'akumd or modity the origiirkl
    sentence imbpos8d, IS,’necessary,       to conform to :
    the probation p&rid        and shall discharg6 the.‘
    defendant.      In case the defendant      has been
    convicted   or 68 entered a’plea        of guilky or
    a plea of nolo contendere,        and the court has
    discharged    the defendant     hereunder,    euch court
    may set aside Me       verdiot or permit      the defetidant
    to withdraw his       lea, and shall ‘dismiss +he            '
    accusation,     campP aint, information or indictment
    agarn6t such defendant,       who shall there-after
    he
    --  released    from  all  penalltie6   and di6abflitieS
    resulting    from the gEos:        or crime of which he
    KXFEiFen convioted               aicn ns-nas pxeaaeo-
    guilty,.except     that proof of his maid conviction
    Crta      of guilty shall be made known to the
    court 6hould the detendant         again br convicted
    of any criminal offenee."
    It seems clear that the court rn which the conviction
    was had mu6t affirmatively    take thelaction   contemplated
    by Section 7 before a defendant     ie    . . . released from
    all disabilitiee   reeulting   from the offense  . . . of which
    he ha6 been convicted..    . .* (Empha6i6 ours)    This includes
    the release L    n the disability   of not being permitted
    to vote.   See Attorney   General  6 Opinion No6. M-640 (1970)
    and V-278 (1947).
    Hon.   Joe Resweber, Page 3        (M-795)
    Accordingly, until the trial court sets aside the
    verdict or permits the withdrawal at the plea of guilty
    and dismisses the *acousation, complaint, information or
    indictment", tbs detendant cumot vote in Texas and a
    votes registration oertitioate  should not be issued to
    him.
    It is generally held in other states that a oon-
    viction of a felony is 6uch a "disabilityg as.would bring
    about a di6qualitication to vote. 
    149 A.L.R. 1075
    , and
    cited authorities.
    SUMMARY
    A voter regi6tration certificate should not
    be issued to one convicted of a felony and placed
    on probation until the court in which the con-
    viction was had has set aside the complaint,
    information or indictment as authorized by 57 ot’
    Article   42.12, Codc.6t   Criminal    Procedure of Texas.
    I’’I
    /I
    Prepared by Lonny F. Zwiener
    c
    Assistant Attorney General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Kerns Ta lor, Chairman
    W. t. Al!en, Co-Chairman
    Roger Tyler
    Pat Bailey
    Bob Lattimore
    James Quick
    MRADE F. GRIFFIN
    Statf Legal AsSiStcUlt
    ALFRED WALKER
    Executive A66i6tant
    NOIA WHITE
    Fir6t   Aeairtant
    -3863-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: M-795

Judges: Crawford Martin

Filed Date: 7/2/1971

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017