Davis v. Hobbs , 2013 Ark. 378 ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                                       Cite as 
    2013 Ark. 378
    SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
    No.   CV-11-488
    Opinion Delivered October   3, 2013
    LAMAR BORIS DAVIS                                   PRO SE APPEAL FROM THE
    APPELLANT           JEFFERSON COUNTY CIRCUIT
    COURT, 35CV-11-63, HON. JODI
    V.                                                  RAINES DENNIS, JUDGE
    RAY HOBBS, DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS
    DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION                            APPEAL DISMISSED.
    APPELLEE
    PER CURIAM
    On July 31, 2011, appellant Lamar Boris Davis, an inmate incarcerated in the Arkansas
    Department of Correction (ADC) at a facility in Jefferson County, filed a pro se petition for writ
    of habeas corpus in the Jefferson County Circuit Court. The circuit court denied the petition,
    and appellant lodged this appeal.
    We dismiss the appeal because the Jefferson County Circuit Court can no longer grant
    the relief requested by appellant. An appeal from an order that denied a petition for
    postconviction relief, including a petition for writ of habeas corpus, will not be permitted to go
    forward where it is clear that the appellant could not prevail. Wilencewicz v. Hobbs, 
    2012 Ark. 230
    (per curiam); Fudge v. Hobbs, 
    2012 Ark. 80
     (per curiam).
    Any petition for writ of habeas corpus to effect the release of a prisoner is properly
    addressed to the circuit court in the county in which the prisoner is held in custody, unless the
    petition is filed pursuant to Act 1780 of 2001. Wilencewicz, 
    2012 Ark. 230
    ; Davis v. Hobbs, 
    2012 Ark. 167
     (per curiam). Appellant’s petition was not filed under Act 1780, and the public records
    Cite as 
    2013 Ark. 378
    of the ADC confirm that appellant is now incarcerated in a facility in Lincoln County.
    A circuit court does not have jurisdiction to release on a writ of habeas corpus a prisoner
    not in custody in that court’s jurisdiction. Chestang v. Hobbs, 
    2011 Ark. 404
     (per curiam);
    Buckhanna v. Hobbs, 
    2011 Ark. 119
     (per curiam). When a prisoner who seeks habeas relief is
    transferred to a facility in a different county, the circuit court in the county where the prisoner
    was previously incarcerated no longer has jurisdiction to issue and make a returnable writ.
    Wilencewicz, 
    2012 Ark. 230
    . Although the Jefferson County Circuit Court may have retained
    subject-matter jurisdiction, it does not retain personal jurisdiction over the person in whose
    custody the prisoner is detained, and an order by that court will not act to effect his release. 
    Id.
    This court will dismiss an appeal of the denial of a petition for writ of habeas corpus where the
    appellant is no longer incarcerated in the county where his petition was filed because the court
    can no longer grant the relief sought. 
    Id.
    Appeal dismissed.
    Lamar Boris Davis, pro se appellant.
    Dustin McDaniel, Att’y Gen., by: Christian Harris, Ass’t Att’y Gen., and Adrienne Woods,
    Law Student Admitted to Practice Pursuant to Rule XV of the Rules Governing Admission to
    the Bar of the Supreme Court under the supervision of Darnisa Evans Johnson, Deputy Att’y Gen.,
    for appellee.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: CV-11-488

Citation Numbers: 2013 Ark. 378

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 10/3/2013

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/3/2016