in Re Advisory Opn on 2018 Pa 368-9 (Senate) ( 2019 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                                         Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    July 5, 2019                                                                                       Bridget M. McCormack,
    Chief Justice
    159160                                                                                                   David F. Viviano,
    Chief Justice Pro Tem
    159201
    Stephen J. Markman
    Brian K. Zahra
    In re HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES                                                                        Richard H. Bernstein
    REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION                                                                          Elizabeth T. Clement
    REGARDING CONSTITUTIONALITY OF                                                                        Megan K. Cavanagh,
    Justices
    
    2018 PA 368
     & 369                                                            SC: 159160
    _________________________________________/
    In re SENATE REQUEST FOR ADVISORY
    OPINION REGARDING CONSTITUTIONALITY
    OF 
    2018 PA 368
     & 369                                                         SC: 159201
    _________________________________________/
    By order of April 3, 2019, the Clerk scheduled these cases for oral argument to be
    held July 17, 2019. The Court respectfully directs the Attorney General to file separate
    supplemental briefs by 5:00 p.m. on July 10, 2019, addressing both sides of the following
    questions: (1) whether this Court has jurisdiction to issue an opinion under Const 1963,
    art 3, § 8 after the effective date of legislation, compare In re 
    2005 PA 71
    , 
    479 Mich 1
    ,
    13 (2007) (“Because the House of Representatives requested an advisory opinion well
    before [the effective] date, this Court indisputably has jurisdiction under art 3, § 8 to
    render an advisory opinion in this matter.”), with 2 Official Record, Constitutional
    Convention 1961, p 3368 (Const 1963, art 3, § 8 “empowers the supreme court to furnish
    advisory opinions . . . only as to legislative acts that are already passed and signed by the
    governor, and before they become effective.”) (emphasis added); and (2) the stare decisis
    effect of In re 
    2005 PA 71
     on this determination, compare Const 1963, art 3, § 8 (“[T]he
    legislature . . . may request the opinion of the supreme court . . . as to the constitutionality
    of legislation . . . .”), with Advisory Opinion on Constitutionality of 
    1975 PA 227
    (Questions 2–10), 
    396 Mich 465
    , 477 (1976) (“An advisory opinion is not precedentially
    binding upon the Court and represents only the opinions of the parties signatory.”).
    I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    July 5, 2019
    t0705
    Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 159201

Filed Date: 7/5/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/10/2019