Lacy v. Yan, Ashtabula Cty. Dog Warden , 2022 Ohio 331 ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as Lacy v. Yan, Ashtabula Cty. Dog Warden, 
    2022-Ohio-331
    .]
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO
    ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    ASHTABULA COUNTY
    JAVONTE LACY,                                        CASE NO. 2022-A-0001
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    Civil Appeal from the
    -v-                                          Court of Common Pleas
    DONNA YAN, ASHTABULA
    COUNTY DOG WARDEN                                    Trial Court No. 2021 CV 00360
    (OFFICIAL CAPACITY), et al.,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    MEMORANDUM
    OPINION
    Decided: February 7, 2022
    Judgment: Appeal dismissed
    Javonte Lacy, pro se, PID# A704-102, Lebanon Correctional Institution, 3791 State
    Route 63, Lebanon, OH 45036 (Plaintiff-Appellant).
    Timothy T. Reid and Kendall A. Grodek, Mansour Gavin, LPA, North Point Tower, 1001
    Lakeside Avenue, Suite 1400, Cleveland, OH 44114 (For Defendants-Appellees).
    JOHN J. EKLUND, J.
    {¶1}    Appellant, Javonte Lacy, filed a pro se appeal from an Ashtabula County
    Court of Common Pleas entry. Appellees filed a motion to dismiss the appeal as untimely,
    and appellant filed a “Motion for Time Extension” to extend the time for filing the appeal.
    {¶2}    App.R. 3(A) expressly states that the only jurisdictional requirement for filing
    a valid appeal is to file it within the time allowed by App.R. 4. The Supreme Court has
    held that the failure to comply with the time requirements of App.R. 4(A) is a jurisdictional
    defect, which is fatal to an appeal. In re H.F., 
    120 Ohio St.3d 499
    , 
    2008-Ohio-6810
    , ¶ 17,
    citing State ex rel. Pendell v. Adams Cty. Bd. of Elections, 
    40 Ohio St.3d 58
    , 60 (1988).
    {¶3}   “Subject to the provisions of App.R. 4(A)(3), a party who wishes to appeal
    from an order that is final upon its entry shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R.
    3 within 30 days of that entry.” See App.R. 4(A)(1). Civ.R. 58(B) directs the clerk of
    courts to serve the parties with notice of the entry within three days of entering the
    judgment upon the journal. If Civ.R. 58(B) service does not occur within three days, the
    time to appeal does not begin to run until service is made and noted in the appearance
    docket. Coles v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp., 
    163 Ohio App.3d 659
    , 664, 
    2005-Ohio-5360
    .
    {¶4}   Here, the record shows the trial court issued its entry on November 12,
    2021. The clerk of courts noted on the appearance docket that notice of the entry under
    Civ.R. 58(B) was issued to the parties on November 16, 2021. Therefore, the time to
    appeal began to run from November 16, 2021. The deadline for appellant to file his notice
    of appeal was December 16, 2022, which was not a holiday or a weekend. Thus,
    appellant’s January 10, 2022 appeal was untimely filed by almost one month.
    {¶5}   This court is not empowered to extend the time deadline in civil cases.
    Pendell, supra at 60; see also App.R. 14(B). Therefore, appellant’s motion to extend the
    time for filing the appeal is overruled.
    {¶6}   Based upon the foregoing, appellee’s motion to dismiss is hereby granted.
    This appeal is dismissed pursuant to App.R. 4(A)(1).
    THOMAS R. WRIGHT, P.J.,
    CYNTHIA WESTCOTT RICE, J.,
    concur.
    2
    Case No. 2022-A-0001
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2022-A-0001

Citation Numbers: 2022 Ohio 331

Judges: Eklund

Filed Date: 2/7/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/14/2022