Garcia v. State , 2015 Ark. App. 673 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                     Cite as 
    2015 Ark. App. 673
    ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
    DIVISION I
    No. CR-14-129
    Opinion Delivered   November 18, 2015
    RENE GARCIA                                          APPEAL FROM THE WASHINGTON
    APPELLANT          COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
    [NO. CR-12-1865-1]
    V.
    HONORABLE WILLIAM A. STOREY,
    JUDGE
    STATE OF ARKANSAS
    APPELLEE
    AFFIRMED; MOTION TO
    WITHDRAW GRANTED
    WAYMOND M. BROWN, Judge
    A Washington County jury found appellant Rene Garcia guilty of two counts of rape
    of a girl who was thirteen years old at the time of the offenses. He was sentenced to a total
    of seventy years’ imprisonment; however, twenty years were suspended. Appellant’s counsel
    has filed a motion to withdraw and a no-merit brief pursuant to Anders v. California1 and Rule
    4-3(k) of the Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals. The clerk of this
    court provided appellant with a copy of counsel’s brief and motion, and notified appellant of
    his right to file pro se points for reversal. Appellant has filed pro se points for reversal, and the
    State has filed a response. We affirm appellant’s convictions and grant counsel’s motion to
    withdraw.
    1
    
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967).
    Cite as 
    2015 Ark. App. 673
    A request to be relieved as counsel on the ground that the appeal is wholly without
    merit shall be accompanied by a brief including an abstract and addendum.2 The brief shall
    contain an argument section that consists of a list of all rulings adverse to the defendant made
    by the trial court with an explanation as to why each adverse ruling is not a meritorious
    ground for reversal.3 It is imperative that counsel follow the appropriate procedure when
    filing a motion to withdraw as counsel.4           In furtherance of the goal of protecting
    constitutional rights, it is both the duty of counsel and of this court to perform a full
    examination of the proceedings as a whole to decide if an appeal would be wholly frivolous.5
    From our review of the record, the brief presented to us, and appellant’s pro se points
    for reversal, we hold that counsel has complied with Rule 4-3(k)(1) and agree that there is no
    merit to an appeal. Therefore, we affirm, by memorandum opinion, appellant’s convictions.6
    We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
    Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted.
    GLOVER and WHITEAKER, JJ., agree.
    Joseph C. Self, for appellant.
    Leslie Rutledge, Att’y Gen., by: Evelyn D. Gomez, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.
    2
    Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-3(k)(1).
    3
    
    Id. 4 Brown
    v. State, 
    85 Ark. App. 382
    , 
    155 S.W.3d 22
    (2004).
    5
    Campbell v. State, 
    74 Ark. App. 277
    , 
    47 S.W.3d 915
    (2001).
    6
    See In re Memorandum Opinions, 
    16 Ark. App. 301
    , 
    700 S.W.2d 63
    (1985).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: CR-14-129

Citation Numbers: 2015 Ark. App. 673

Judges: Waymond M. Brown

Filed Date: 11/18/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/17/2016