United States v. Titcombe , 71 M.J. 312 ( 2012 )

CCA 37618. Review granted on the following issue:

WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT ERRED BY FINDING THAT ADDITIONAL CHARGE II ALLEGING UNLAWFUL ENTRY UNDER ARTICLE 134 WAS NOT DEFICIENT BECAUSE THE “MILITARY JUDGE IS PRESUMED TO KNOW THE LAW AND APPLY IT CORRECTLY WHEN SITTING AS THE TRIER OF FACT.”

No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.