Northrop Grumman Corporation ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                  ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
    Appeal of -                                        )
    )
    Northrop Grumman Corporation                       ) ASBCA No. 61775
    )
    Under Contract No. FA8620-13-D-3014 et al.         )
    APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT:                        James A. Tucker, Esq.
    David A. Churchill, Esq.
    Daniel E. Chudd, Esq.
    Morrison & Foerster LLP
    Washington, DC
    APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT:                       Arthur M. Taylor, Esq.
    DCMA Chief Trial Attorney
    Robert L. Duecaster, Esq.
    Trial Attorney
    Defense Contract Management Agency
    Chantilly, VA
    OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE PROUTY
    In our decision dated October 7, 2020, we sustained the appeal in whole and
    remanded it to the parties to calculate quantum. See Northrop Grumman Corp., ASBCA
    No. 61775, 20-1 BCA ¶ 37,712 at 183,604. The parties have subsequently come to an
    agreement upon the proper figure for the award in this appeal and submitted a joint
    stipulation to the Board requesting the entry of judgment in that agreed-upon amount.
    It is the Board’s decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. §§ 7105(e), 7108(b), and the
    parties’ stipulation and agreement, that the appeal is sustained. In the nature of a consent
    judgment, the Board makes a monetary award to appellant in the amount of
    $68,511,032.45. This amount is inclusive of Contract Disputes Act interest if payment is
    made within 30 days of the entry of this judgment. If payment is not made within that
    time, interest shall be paid on any amount still owing, up to $61,841,597.45, ∗ pursuant to
    ∗
    We cap the amount of the judgment upon which interest may be paid at $61,841,597.45
    because that is the amount that the parties have stipulated is the “principal”
    amount of the claim, with the balance of the $68,511,032.45 judgment being
    already-incurred Contract Disputes Act interest, which is not subject to further
    interest. Although the parties’ stipulation was somewhat ambiguous on this
    matter, their joint motion for entry of judgment (which this judgment reflects) was
    not, and we presume that the parties intended a judgment which is statutorily
    permissible.
    41 U.S.C. § 7109 from February 28, 2021 until date of payment.
    Dated: April 16, 2021
    J. REID PROUTY
    Administrative Judge
    Vice Chairman
    Armed Services Board
    of Contract Appeals
    I concur                                         I concur
    RICHARD SHACKLEFORD                              DAVID D’ALESSANDRIS
    Administrative Judge                             Administrative Judge
    Acting Chairman                                  Armed Services Board
    Armed Services Board                             of Contract Appeals
    of Contract Appeals
    I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the
    Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61775, Appeal of Northrop
    Grumman Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.
    Dated: April 16, 2021
    PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS
    Recorder, Armed Services
    Board of Contract Appeals
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: ASBCA No. 61775

Judges: Prouty

Filed Date: 4/16/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/28/2021