Calhoun v. Delhi & Middletown Railroad , 35 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 379 ( 1882 )

Learned, P. J.:

I concur in the result. But I am not willing to say that the payment of interest is an estoppel; at least as to any persons, except those who may have purchased bonds, relying on the fact of previous payments of interest by the obligors.

Present — Learned, P. J., and Westbrook, J.; Bookes, J., not acting.

Order vacating injunction affirmed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements.