People v. Mancha CA4/1 ( 2014 )


Menu:
  • Filed 6/12/14 P. v. Mancha CA4/1
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
    California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
    publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
    or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
    COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    DIVISION ONE
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA
    THE PEOPLE,                                                         D064797
    Plaintiff and Respondent,
    v.                                                         (Super. Ct. No. SCS265572)
    OSCAR CARLOS MANCHA,
    Defendant and Appellant.
    APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Frances M.
    Devaney, Judge. Affirmed.
    Christian C. Buckley, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant
    and Appellant.
    No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    The People charged Oscar Carlos Mancha with illegal possession of a firearm
    (Pen. Code, § 30305, subd. (a)(1); count 1); and possession of methamphetamine (Health
    & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a); count 2). As to both counts, it was alleged that he had
    suffered a strike within the meaning of the "Three Strikes" law. (Pen. Code, §§ 211, 667,
    subds. (b)-(i).)
    Mancha pleaded guilty to the two counts, and admitted the enhancement allegation
    as to count 1 only. In exchange, the People dismissed the enhancement allegation as to
    count 2. The court sentenced Mancha to a stipulated term of 40 months in prison.
    Before taking the plea, the court verified Mancha had signed and discussed the
    change of plea form with his attorney, who had satisfactorily answered Mancha's
    questions. The court asked if Mancha was freely and voluntarily giving up his right to a
    trial, and Mancha replied in the affirmative.
    DISCUSSION
    Appointed counsel has filed a brief summarizing the facts and proceedings in the
    trial court. Counsel presents no argument for reversal but asks this court to review the
    record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 
    25 Cal.3d 436
    . Pursuant to
    Anders v. California (1967) 
    386 U.S. 738
    , counsel refers to the possible but not arguable
    issue of whether Mancha's plea was knowing and voluntary. We granted Mancha
    permission to file a brief on his own behalf, but he did not do so.
    Our review of the entire record pursuant to People v. Wende, supra, 
    25 Cal.3d 436
    and Anders v. California, 
    supra,
     
    386 U.S. 738
    , including the possible issue referred to by
    appellate counsel has disclosed no reasonably arguable appellate issues. Mancha was
    competently represented by counsel on this appeal.
    2
    DISPOSITION
    The judgment is affirmed.
    O'ROURKE, J.
    WE CONCUR:
    BENKE, Acting P. J.
    McDONALD, J.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: D064797

Filed Date: 6/12/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014