Murray v. Emsof Realty Corp. , 10 A.D.2d 619 ( 1960 )

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent. The allegedly improper exclusion of expert testimony need not be considered since the proof establishes that plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of fact. Concur —Botein, P. J., Breitel, M. M. Frank, Valente and McNally, JJ. [15 Misc 2d 535.]