Ex Parte James Carrillo Garcia ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • Opinion filed January 20, 2022
    In The
    Eleventh Court of Appeals
    ____________
    Nos. 11-22-00011-CR & 11-22-00012-CR
    ____________
    EX PARTE JAMES CARRILLO GARCIA
    Original Habeas Corpus Proceedings
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    James Carrillo Garcia has filed in this court a pro se application for writ of
    habeas corpus related to two causes pending in the 106th District Court of Gaines
    County: Cause Nos. 21-5627 and 21-5628.1 Garcia asserts that his constitutional
    rights are being violated and that he is being illegally restrained, and he asks this
    court for habeas relief. We dismiss these proceedings.
    1
    In correspondence attached to his application, Garcia stated that he previously sent the application
    to the Gaines County District Clerk but that she returned it to Garcia. When a person who is confined after
    indictment on a felony charge wishes to seek relief by way of habeas corpus, “he may apply to the judge of
    the court in which he is indicted.” TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.08 (West 2015). Because Garcia
    has already attempted to file his application with the district clerk, we are forwarding his application to the
    district clerk with instructions that it be filed there.
    This court has no jurisdiction over Garcia’s original application for writ of
    habeas corpus. This court’s authority to exercise original jurisdiction is limited. See
    TEX. CONST. art. V, §§ 5, 6 (providing that the Court of Criminal Appeals has the
    power to issue writs of habeas corpus and that intermediate courts of appeals only
    have original jurisdiction as prescribed by law); TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221
    (West Supp. 2021) (limited writ powers granted to the courts of appeals).
    Furthermore, an intermediate appellate court “does not possess original habeas
    corpus jurisdiction of a bail issue” in a criminal case. Ortiz v. State, 
    299 S.W.3d 930
    , 932 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2009, no pet.); see Ex parte Enriquez, 
    2 S.W.3d 362
    ,
    363 (Tex. App.—Waco 1999, orig. proceeding); Denby v. State, 
    627 S.W.2d 435
    (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1981, orig. proceeding); see also TEX. CODE CRIM.
    PROC. ANN. art. 11.05 (West 2015) (providing that district courts, county courts, and
    the Court of Criminal Appeals have power to issue writs of habeas corpus).
    Because we lack jurisdiction over Garcia’s application for writ of habeas
    corpus, we dismiss these proceedings for want of jurisdiction.
    PER CURIAM
    January 20, 2022
    Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
    Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,
    Trotter, J., and Williams, J.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-22-00012-CR

Filed Date: 1/20/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/22/2022