Potts v. State , 564 S.W.3d 741 ( 2018 )

PER CURIAM.

Freddie Potts appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous, and we affirm.

*742An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).