United States v. Rubi Martinez-Soto , 588 F. App'x 656 ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                                                             FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                             DEC 17 2014
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 13-10633
    Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. 4:13-cr-00482-CKJ
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    RUBI ROXANA MARTINEZ-SOTO,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the District of Arizona
    Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted December 9, 2014**
    Before:        WALLACE, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
    Rubi Roxana Martinez-Soto challenges the 48-month, below-Guidelines
    sentence imposed by the district court following her guilty-plea conviction for
    possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 
    21 U.S.C. § 841
    (a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(viii), and importation of methamphetamine, in violation of
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
    21 U.S.C. §§ 952
    (a), 960(a)(1) and 960(b)(1)(H). We have jurisdiction under 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
    , and we affirm.
    Martinez-Soto claims that the district court applied the wrong legal standard
    to her request for a minor role reduction under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b). Our review is
    de novo. See United States v. Hurtado, 
    760 F.3d 1065
    , 1068 (9th Cir. 2014). The
    district court properly compared Martinez-Soto’s culpability to that of the average
    participants in the overall drug trafficking scheme in which she was involved. See
    
    id. at 1068-69
    .
    Moreover, the district court did not clearly err in finding that Martinez-
    Soto’s role in the drug trafficking scheme was not minor, given that she was paid
    by the traffickers to import a substantial quantity of pure methamphetamine into
    this country, and had also worked as a drug courier for them two days before her
    arrest. See United States v. Rodriguez-Castro, 
    641 F.3d 1189
    , 1192-93 (9th Cir.
    2011).
    AFFIRMED.
    2                                    13-10633
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-10633

Citation Numbers: 588 F. App'x 656

Filed Date: 12/17/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/13/2023