Clarence Jones v. ITT Systems Division , 595 F. App'x 662 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                   United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 14-2310
    ___________________________
    Clarence T. Jones
    lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
    v.
    ITT Systems Division
    lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
    ____________
    Submitted: March 5, 2015
    Filed: March 13, 2015
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before SMITH, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    Clarence T. Jones appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his action without
    prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction over defendant. After de novo review, see
    1
    The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for the Western
    District of Missouri.
    Dever v. Hentzen Coatings, Inc., 
    380 F.3d 1070
    , 1072 (8th Cir. 2004), this court
    affirms. The record shows that defendant did not have sufficient minimum contacts
    with Missouri to satisfy due process, as required for specific jurisdiction, see Myers
    v. Casino Queen, Inc., 
    689 F.3d 904
    , 911 (8th Cir. 2012) (listing appropriate factors
    to consider); Bell Paper Box, Inc. v. Trans W. Polymers, Inc., 
    53 F.3d 920
    , 922-23
    (8th Cir. 1995) (merely entering into contract with forum resident does not provide
    requisite contacts between nonresident defendant and forum state; use of interstate
    facilities, such as telephones or mail, cannot alone provide minimum contacts required
    by due process); and defendant did not have continuous and systematic relations with
    Missouri, as required for general jurisdiction, see Daimler AG v. Bauman, 
    134 S. Ct. 746
    , 760-61 & n.19 (2014) (general jurisdiction inquiry is whether corporation’s
    affiliations with forum state are so continuous and systematic as to render it essentially
    at home in forum state; place of incorporation and principal place of business are
    paradigm bases for general jurisdiction).
    The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-2310

Citation Numbers: 595 F. App'x 662

Filed Date: 3/13/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/13/2023