Ring Power Corp. v. Condado-Perez , 224 So. 3d 885 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    In light of the reversal of the underlying judgment on which the attorney’s fee order in this appeal is based, Ring Power Corp. v. Condado-Perez, 219 So.3d 1028, 1030 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017), we reverse the order on attorney’s fees. See ARC Foods, Inc. v. MGI Props., 746 So.2d 514, 514 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Siegel v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, 100 So.3d 783, 784 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012); S & I Invs. v. Payless Flea Mkt., Inc., 40 So.3d 48, 49 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

    Reversed.

    KHOUZAM, SALARIO, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.

Document Info

Docket Number: Case No. 2D16-3769

Citation Numbers: 224 So. 3d 885

Judges: Badalamenti, Khouzam, Salario

Filed Date: 8/18/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/23/2021