-
Appellant was represented on appeal by counsel who did not represent him on trial of the cause. The remark of the trial judge constituted unlawful comments of a prejudicial nature in violation of both the letter and spirit of Art. IV, § 16, of our state constitution. *Page 771 While appellant may be devoid of every manly instinct and guilty of a most abhorrent crime, nevertheless he is entitled to a fair trial. The judgment should be reversed with direction to trial court to grant a new trial.
May 2, 1946. Petition for rehearing denied.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 29812.
Citation Numbers: 167 P.2d 173, 24 Wash. 2d 764
Judges: STEINERT, J.
Filed Date: 3/22/1946
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/13/2023