J Quirno v. F Wilson ( 2009 )

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 JOSE E. CASTRO QUIRINO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellant, 4 v. No. 29,363 5 FRANK WILSON, et al., 6 Defendants-Appellees. 7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF OTERO COUNTY 8 Don Maddox, District Judge 9 Jose E. Castro Quirino 10 Clayton, NM 11 Pro Se Appellant 12 Rosner & Chavez, LLC 13 Frank N. Chavez 14 Las Cruces, NM 15 for Appellees Trujillo, Wilson, Martinez & Stevens 16 Marie Mattison 17 Alamogordo, NM 18 Pro Se Appellee 19 MEMORANDUM OPINION 20 VIGIL, Judge. 21 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 22 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 1 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 2 AFFIRMED. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 ________________________________ 5 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 6 WE CONCUR: 7 ________________________________ 8 CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge 9 ________________________________ 10 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 2