United States v. Boyd ( 2002 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6439
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JOHN LEE BOYD, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (CR-93-123-F)
Submitted: July 19, 2002 Decided: August 5, 2002
Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Lee Boyd, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
John Lee Boyd seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence under 18
U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2002), based upon Amendment 599 to the
sentencing guidelines. Our review of the record and the district
court’s opinion discloses that, although the court may have
erroneously concluded that Amendment 599 applied to Boyd’s
conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) (1994), there is nevertheless
no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Boyd’s motion for
appointment of counsel and affirm. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2