Wolff v. Barahona ( 2007 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 06-1143
    In Re:   ULISES SANTIAGO BARAHONA,
    Debtor.
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    MICHAEL G. WOLFF, Trustee,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    GERARDO BARAHONA;     SONIA   BARAHONA;     ULISES
    SANTIAGO BARAHONA,
    Defendants - Appellees,
    and
    MASON DIXON FUNDING, INCORPORATED,
    Defendant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt.    Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge.
    (8:05-cv-02122-DKC; AP-03-3100-PM; BK-03-3100-PM)
    Submitted:   April 20, 2007                      Decided:   May 4, 2007
    Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Jeffrey M. Orenstein, GOREN, WOLFF & ORENSTEIN, LLC, Rockville,
    Maryland, for Appellant.     Gwen Hickman, HICKMAN LAW OFFICES,
    Vienna, Virginia; Malcolm W. Houston, LAW OFFICE OF MALCOLM
    HOUSTON, Potomac, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    - 2 -
    PER CURIAM:
    Michael G. Wolff, the Chapter 7 Trustee in the underlying
    bankruptcy proceeding, appeals from the district court’s order
    affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting summary judgment in
    favor   of    the   Appellees   on   his   action      seeking    to    avoid   the
    conveyance of certain real property under 
    11 U.S.C. § 548
    (a)
    (2000).      We have reviewed the record included on appeal and the
    parties’ briefs and find no reversible error.                    Accordingly, we
    affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.                      Wolff v.
    Barahona,     No.   8:05-cv-02122-DKC      (D.   Md.   Nov.   23,      2005).    We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    - 3 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 06-1143

Filed Date: 5/4/2007

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021