United States v. Carl Emerson Sloan , 112 F.3d 518 ( 1997 )


Menu:
  • 112 F.3d 518

    NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.
    Carl Emerson SLOAN, Defendant-Appellant.

    No. 96-50224.

    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

    Submitted April 21, 1997.*
    Decided April 24, 1997.

    Before BROWNING, THOMPSON and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

    1

    MEMORANDUM**

    2

    Carl Emerson Sloan appeals his conviction and sentence for bank robbery. His counsel submitted a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Our independent review of the record discloses no issues for review. Accordingly, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw and affirm the district court's judgment.

    3

    AFFIRMED.

    *

    The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

    **

    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Document Info

Docket Number: 96-50224

Citation Numbers: 112 F.3d 518

Filed Date: 4/24/1997

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/22/2014