Sodexho, Inc. and v. Curtis Clanton ( 2008 )

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Haley, Millette and Senior Judge Coleman SODEXHO, INC. AND INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA/AIG DOMESTIC CLAIMS, INC. MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 2364-07-2 PER CURIAM FEBRUARY 12, 2008 CURTIS CLANTON FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Bryan J. Olmos; Semmes, Bowen & Semmes, on brief), for appellants. (Louis D. Snesil; Marks & Harrison, on brief), for appellee. Sodexho, Inc. and its insurer contend the Workers’ Compensation Commission erred in finding that Curtis Clanton proved he sustained a compensable change in condition and awarding him temporary total disability benefits commencing April 14, 2006. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Clanton v. Sodexho, Inc., VWC File No. 221-53-73 (Aug. 30, 2007). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 1 Affirmed. * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. 1 In rendering our decision, we have considered only those documents which were in the record and properly before the commission when it rendered its decision.