Koon v. Rushton ( 2007 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 07-6239
    ROBERT HOLLAND KOON,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    COLIE    RUSHTON,    Warden  of    McCormick
    Correctional    Institution; HENRY    DARGAN
    MCMASTER, Attorney General of the State of
    South Carolina,
    Respondents - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Anderson. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
    (8:05-cv-02523-RBH)
    Submitted: June 15, 2007                    Decided:   June 21, 2007
    Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Robert Holland Koon, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, William
    Edgar Salter, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH
    CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Robert Holland Koon seeks to appeal the district court’s
    order denying his motion to stay federal proceedings pending
    resolution of his state court proceedings.    The court’s order also
    rejected the magistrate judge’s recommendation that Koon’s entire
    
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
     (2000) petition be dismissed and recommitted the
    matter to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. This court
    may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
    (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 
    28 U.S.C. § 1292
     (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
    Loan Corp., 
    337 U.S. 541
     (1949).   The order Koon seeks to appeal is
    neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral
    order.    Accordingly,   we   dismiss   the   appeal   for   lack   of
    jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-6239

Filed Date: 6/21/2007

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021