Hurt v. Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution ( 2009 )

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-2212 TYRONE HURT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION; MARY SURRALT; SANDRA DAY O’CONNOR, Defendants - Appellees. No. 08-2213 TYRONE HURT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE AMERICAN PEOPLE; GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States; U.S. SENATE; U.S. CONGRESS; THE COUNTRY OF IRAN, Defendants - Appellees. No. 08-2215 TYRONE HURT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. No. 08-2216 TYRONE HURT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. No. 08-2218 TYRONE HURT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States; U.S. CONGRESS; U.S. SENATE; THE COUNTRY OF IRAN; ALL NEWS MEDIA OF THIS NATION, U.S.A., Defendants - Appellees. 2 No. 08-2226 TYRONE HURT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DEDLEY AND SINGLETARY, INCORPORATED; COATES AND LANE, INCORPORATED; WOODLEY HOUSE, INCORPORATED; U.S. VS. NICHOLS; HURT VS. USDC DC NAT., Defendants - Appellees. No. 08-2227 TYRONE HURT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CLINTON; U.S.D.C. FOR THE D.C.; U.S.C.A. FOR THE D.C. CIR; FALUN GONG PRACTITIONERS OF CHINA, Defendants - Appellees. No. 08-2228 TYRONE HURT, Plaintiff - Appellant, 3 v. JIM CROW; NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:08-cv-00808-LMB-TCB; 1:08-cv-00913-LMB-TRJ; 1:08-cv-00914-LMB-TRJ; 1:08-cv-00915-LMB-TCB; 1:08-cv-00916-LMB- JFA; 1:08-cv-00917-LMB-JFA; 1:08-cv-00918-LMB-TRJ; 1:08-cv- 00944-LMB-JFA) Submitted: January 30, 2009 Decided: March 13, 2009 Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tyrone Hurt, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 4 PER CURIAM: Tyrone Hurt appeals the district court’s orders dismissing these actions as frivolous or for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the records and find that the appeals are frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for the reasons stated by the district court. Hurt v. Eighth Amendment; Hurt v. The American People; Hurt v. United States; Hurt v. United States; Hurt v. Bush; Hurt v. Dedley and Singletary, Inc.; Hurt v. Clinton; Hurt v. Jim Crow, Nos. 1:08-cv-00808-LMB- TCB; 1:08-cv-00913-LMB-TRJ; 1:08-cv-00914-LMB-TRJ; 1:08-cv- 00915-LMB-TCB; 1:08-cv-00916-LMB-JFA; 1:08-cv-00917-LMB-JFA; 1:08-cv-00918-LMB-TRJ; 1:08-cv-00944-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 9, 2008, entered Sept. 11, 2008; Sept. 12, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 5