In Re: Frazier v. , 101 F. App'x 900 ( 2004 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 04-6194
    In Re:   REGINALD L. FRAZIER,
    Petitioner.
    No. 04-6195
    In Re:   REGINALD L. FRAZIER,
    Petitioner.
    No. 04-6196
    In Re:   REGINALD L. FRAZIER,
    Petitioner.
    On Petitions for Writ of Coram Nobis and Writ of Habeas Corpus.
    (CA-29-4; CA-02-6644-BO; CA-03-1338)
    Submitted:   May 28, 2004                 Decided:    June 30, 2004
    Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
    Judge.
    Petitions denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Reginald L. Frazier, Petitioner Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    - 2 -
    PER CURIAM:
    These three original proceedings, filed in this court by
    Reginald L. Frazier, have been consolidated for consideration.    In
    No. 04-6194, Frazier seeks relief through a petition for coram
    nobis, pursuant to the All Writs Act, 
    28 U.S.C. § 1651
     (2000), and
    the habeas corpus statute, 
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
     (2000).      He asks for
    the refund of all fines and fees paid to the North Carolina State
    Bar Council, the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, and this court, along with one hundred
    times those amounts as a sanction.     He also requests reinstatement
    of his social security benefits.     As neither coram nobis nor the
    § 2254 habeas statute can provide the relief Frazier seeks, we deny
    the petition.
    No. 04-6195 and No. 04-6196 seem to be untimely petitions
    for rehearing of our decisions in In re Frazier, No. 03-6701, 
    2003 WL 21733141
     (4th Cir. July 28, 2003) (unpublished), and        In re
    Frazier, No. 03-1382, 
    2003 WL 1958771
     (4th Cir. Apr. 28, 2003)
    (unpublished).   As these final decisions are not subject to such
    attack, see Fed. R. App. P. 40(a)(1), we deny the petitions.
    Although we grant Frazier leave to proceed in forma
    pauperis in each case, we deny his motions for writ of coram nobis
    and writ of habeas corpus.   We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
    - 3 -
    materials   before   the   court   and     argument   would   not   aid   the
    decisional process.
    PETITIONS DENIED
    - 4 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-6194, 04-6195, 04-6196

Citation Numbers: 101 F. App'x 900

Judges: Hamilton, King, Motz, Per Curiam, Petitions

Filed Date: 6/30/2004

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/6/2023