Moor (Mark) v. State ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                         because this court has previously rejected this challenge. 2 See Hall v.
    State, 
    91 Nev. 314
    , 
    535 P.2d 797
     (1975). Further, any challenge to the
    decision to deny parole was without merit because parole is an act of grace
    of the State and there is no cause of action when parole has been denied.
    See NRS 213.10705; Niergarth v. Warden, 
    105 Nev. 26
    , 28, 
    768 P.2d 882
    ,
    883 (1989). Accordingly, we
    ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
    Ginons
    J.
    Douglas
    Saitta
    cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge
    Mark Moor
    Attorney General/Carson City
    Carson City District Attorney
    Carson City Clerk
    2SeeMoor v. State, Docket No. 47889 (Order of Affirmance, January
    10, 2007); Moor v. Warden, Docket No. 53554 (Order of Affirmance,
    November 3, 2009).
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    2
    (0) 1947A    0.94f1
    grngEMESSMAMRke-17". -
    i                 .                               •=1-47113/fallaRE'W      NAME
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 61492

Filed Date: 5/14/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/31/2014