United States v. Rene Ivan Raudales-Garay , 439 F. App'x 811 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                                                              [DO NOT PUBLISH]
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________           FILED
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    No. 11-11143         ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    Non-Argument Calendar      AUGUST 30, 2011
    ________________________        JOHN LEY
    CLERK
    D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-00510-TCB-AJB-1
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    RENE IVAN RAUDALES-GARAY,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Georgia
    ________________________
    (August 30, 2011)
    Before WILSON, PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:
    Rene Ivan Raudales-Garay appeals his sentence of imprisonment for 21
    months, which was imposed after he pleaded guilty to illegally reentering the
    United States after being deported. 
    8 U.S.C. § 1326
    (a). Garay argues that his
    sentence below the advisory guideline range is substantively unreasonable. We
    affirm.
    We review a sentence for reasonableness under a deferential standard for
    abuse of discretion, Gall v. United States, 
    552 U.S. 38
    , 41, 
    128 S. Ct. 586
    , 591
    (2007), and the party challenging the sentence bears the burden of establishing
    that it is unreasonable, United States v. Talley, 
    431 F.3d 784
    , 788 (11th Cir. 2005).
    We will reverse a sentence as substantively unreasonable only if, after considering
    the totality of the circumstances, we are left with the definite and firm conviction
    that the district court committed a clear error of judgment in weighing the relevant
    sentencing factors. United States v. Irey, 
    612 F.3d 1160
    , 1189–90 (11th Cir.
    2010) (en banc), cert. denied, 
    131 S. Ct. 1813
     (2011).
    Garay’s sentence is reasonable. The eight-level enhancement of Garay’s
    sentence rationally deters those who seek to reenter the United States illegally
    after having committed several crimes. Garay entered the United States illegally
    three times and has 11 prior convictions, including a burglary conviction. The
    district court reasonably determined that, in the light of Garay’s criminal history, a
    sentence of 21 months promotes deterrence, protection of the public, and respect
    for the law, and it reflects the seriousness of Garay’s offense. 
    18 U.S.C. §
                   2
    3553(a). Garay’s sentence is below the advisory guideline sentence of 24 months.
    The district court did not abuse its discretion.
    AFFIRMED.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-11143

Citation Numbers: 439 F. App'x 811

Judges: Black, Per Curiam, Pryor, Wilson

Filed Date: 8/30/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/5/2023