Castillo v. Johnson , 96 F. App'x 131 ( 2004 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 03-7963
    MARCOS ALVAREZ CASTILLO,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    GENE M. JOHNSON, Director      of   the   Virginia
    Department of Corrections,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
    Judge. (CA-03-128-2)
    Submitted:   March 25, 2004                   Decided:   April 30, 2004
    Before TRAXLER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Marcos Alvarez Castillo, Appellant Pro Se.  Josephine Frances
    Whalen, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond,
    Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Marcos Alvarez Castillo seeks to appeal the district
    court’s order dismissing as untimely his petition filed under 
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
     (2000).     An appeal may not be taken from the final
    order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge
    issues a certificate of appealability.            
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1)
    (2000).   A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a
    substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”             
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(2) (2000).     A prisoner satisfies this standard by
    demonstrating    that   reasonable   jurists      would   find    that   his
    constitutional   claims   are   debatable   and    that   any    dispositive
    procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or
    wrong.    See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 
    537 U.S. 322
    , 336-38 (2003);
    Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    , 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 
    252 F.3d 676
    , 683 (4th Cir. 2001).        We have independently reviewed the
    record and conclude that Castillo has not made the requisite
    showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny
    leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal.              We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-7963

Citation Numbers: 96 F. App'x 131

Judges: Duncan, King, Per Curiam, Traxler

Filed Date: 4/30/2004

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/6/2023