James v. Dept. Of Veterans Affairs ( 2012 )

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit SAMUEL M. JAMES, Claimant-Appellant, V. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee. 2012-7129 Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in case no. 11-2539, Judge Alan G. Lance, Sr. » ON MOTION ORDER Upon review of the duplicate documents submitted by Samuel M. James, the court determines that the two documents should not have been filed as different entries. The Secretary moves for an extension of time to file his brief. J ames filed a document entitled "Appellant Appeal for a Writ," which was filed by the court as a motion within SAMUEL JAMES V. SHINSEKI 2 this appeal. A few days later the court received another copy of that document from James, and the court treated that as his brief. The court rejected the brief for failure to use the official court form (enclosed). lt appears that James is attempting to make argu- ments concerning the merits of his case, and such argu- ments should be in a brief. The filing of the other copy of that document as a motion was unnecessary, and the motion is denied. Accordingly, IT Is ORDERED THAT: (1) The document treated as a motion, i.e., "Appellant Appeal for a Writ," is denied because such arguments should be made in the appellant's brief. » (2) The Secretary's motions are granted. The Secre- ta'ry's brief is due within 21 days of the date.of filing of this order. FoR THE CoURT 2 8 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date J an Horbaly \' Clerk cc: Samuel M. James Corinne A. Niosi, Esq. s8 U.S. COUR`l:lJlI'=E\PPEALS FOB me Fsnsa¢xicuzcun AUG 2 8 2012 JAN HOBBALY C|.ERK