NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
mnfteb ~tate~ ~ourt of ~peaI~
for tbe jfeberaI ~frtuft
PERPETUA SAOY-CINCO,
Claimant-Appellant,
v.
ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS,
Respondent-Appellee.
2012-7027
Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for
Veterans Claims in 10-1902, Judge Kenneth B. Kramer.
ON MOTION
ORDER
Upon review of this recently docketed appeal, it ap-
pears that Perpetua Saoy-Cinco's appeal was not timely
filed.
On September 20, 2011, the United States Court of
Appeals for Veterans Claims entered judgment in Saoy-
Cinco's case. The court received Saoy-Cinco's notice of
appeal on November 22, 2011, 63 days after the date of
judgment.
SAOY-CINCO v. DVA 2
To be timely, a notice of appeal must be received by
the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims within 60 days
of the entry of judgment. See
38 U.S.C. § 7292(a);
28
U.S.C. § 2107(b); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1).
Accordingly,
IT Is ORDERED THAT:
(1) Saoy-Cinco is directed to show cause, within 60
days of the date of filing of this order why this appeal
should not be dismissed as untimely. The Secretary of
Veterans Affairs may also respond within that time.
(2) The briefing schedule is stayed.
FOR THE COURT
JAN 1 -, 2012 lsI Jan Horbaly
Date Jan Horbaly.
Clerk
cc: Perpetua Saoy-Cinco
Tara K. Hogan, Esq. FILED
u.s. COURT OF APPEALS FOR
s19 THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
JAN 172012
JANHORBALY
ClERK
