Walker v. Scott ( 2006 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6966
HARRY WALKER, a/k/a Musa Aquil,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MORGAN E. SCOTT, JR.; BRETT BRAUMBAUGH, Postal
Inspector; VIRGINIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, South
Boston; MR. GRANT, New York District Attorney
in charge of case 552-95; R. S. PULLIAM,
Major; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District
Judge. (7:05-cv-00010-jct)
Submitted: September 25, 2006 Decided: October 18, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harry Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Sara Bugbee Winn, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia; Carlene Booth Johnson,
PERRY LAW FIRM, PC, Dillwyn, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Harry Walker appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000)
and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Walker v. Scott, No. 7:05-cv-00010-jct (W.D.
Va. May 4, 2006). Walker’s motions for general relief are denied.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -