Miley v. Rylander ( 2000 )


Menu:
  •                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
    No. 99-50884
    Conference Calendar
    BENTON G. MILEY, III,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    versus
    CAROLE KEETON RYLANDER,
    Comptroller of Public Accounts,
    State of Texas, in Her Official Capacity,
    Defendant-Appellee.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Texas
    USDC No. A-99-CV-452-JN
    --------------------
    February 16, 2000
    Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Benton G. Miley III, TDCJ #775702, filed a 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
    action, seeking a declaratory judgment that the Texas drug tax
    was a punishment for purposes of the Double Jeopardy Clause.    The
    claim is not cognizable in a § 1983 action unless the challenged
    conviction has been invalidated because the action necessarily
    implies the invalidity of the conviction.     See Edwards v.
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
    that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
    except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
    R. 47.5.4.
    No. 99-50884
    -2-
    Balisok, 
    540 U.S. 641
    , 648 (1997); Heck v. Humphrey, 
    512 U.S. 477
    , 486-87 (1994); Clarke v. Stalder, 
    154 F.3d 186
    , 190 (5th
    Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 
    119 S. Ct. 1052
     (1999).    Miley’s appeal
    is frivolous and is DISMISSED as such.    See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
    Miley is warned that the dismissals of his claim by the
    district court for failure to state a claim and of his appeal by
    this court as frivolous count as two strikes for purposes of 
    28 U.S.C. § 1915
    (g).   See Adepegba v. Hammons, 
    103 F.3d 383
    , 387
    (5th Cir. 1996)(“[D]ismissals as frivolous in the district courts
    or the court of appeals count [as strikes] for the purposes of
    [§ 1915(g)].”).   We caution Miley that once he accumulates three
    strikes, he may not proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action
    or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any
    facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical
    injury.   See 
    28 U.S.C. § 1915
    (g).
    APPEAL DISMISSED.   SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 99-50884

Filed Date: 2/16/2000

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021