Wingfield v. Saraiya ( 2005 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 05-7147
    ROGER WINGFIELD,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    DOCTOR SARAIYA,
    Defendant - Appellee,
    and
    KATHLEEN HAWK-SAWYER,
    Defendant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District
    Judge. (CA-03-881-1-CMH)
    Submitted:   October 20, 2005             Decided:   October 31, 2005
    Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Roger Wingfield, Appellant Pro Se. John David McChesney, RAWLS &
    MCNELIS, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Roger     Wingfield    appeals      the    district    court’s   order
    denying relief on his 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     (2000) complaint.                We have
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.                Accordingly, we
    affirm   for   the   reasons     stated   by    the    district    court.    See
    Wingfield v. Saraiya, No. CA-03-881-1-CMH (E.D. Va. filed June 24,
    2005 & entered June 28, 2005).            We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-7147

Filed Date: 10/31/2005

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014