United States v. Juan Montes-Torres , 519 F. App'x 485 ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                             MAY 21 2013
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 12-50159
    Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. 3:11-cr-01424-MMA
    v.
    MEMORANDUM *
    JUAN MONTES-TORRES,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of California
    Michael M. Anello, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted May 14, 2013 **
    Before:        LEAVY, THOMAS, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
    Juan Montes-Torres appeals from the district court’s judgment and
    challenges the order denying his motion to dismiss the indictment charging him
    with being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 
    8 U.S.C. § 1326
    . We dismiss.
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    The government argues that this appeal should be dismissed because
    Montes-Torres waived his right to appeal pretrial constitutional defects when he
    entered an unconditional guilty plea. We review de novo whether a defendant
    waived his right to appeal. See United States v. Arias-Espinosa, 
    704 F.3d 616
    , 618
    (9th Cir. 2012).
    When Montes-Torres entered his guilty plea, he did not preserve his right to
    challenge the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment. Thus,
    he waived his right to bring this appeal. See United States v. Lopez-Armenta, 
    400 F.3d 1173
    , 1175 (9th Cir. 2005). Contrary to Montes-Torres’s contention, the
    district court’s statement at the subsequent sentencing hearing that he retained the
    right to appeal did not restore his right to appeal the court’s denial of his motion to
    dismiss. See 
    id. at 1176-77
    .
    DISMISSED.
    2                                     12-50159
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-50159

Citation Numbers: 519 F. App'x 485

Judges: Leavy, Murguia, Thomas

Filed Date: 5/21/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/6/2023