Com. v. Moss, R. ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • J-S60023-15
    NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37
    COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA                   IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
    PENNSYLVANIA
    Appellee
    v.
    RUSSELL WESLEY MOSS
    Appellant                No. 1463 EDA 2015
    Appeal from the PCRA Order April 27, 2015
    In the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County
    Criminal Division at No(s): CP-23-CR-0002091-2002
    BEFORE: BENDER, P.J.E., LAZARUS, J., and OTT, J.
    JUDGMENT ORDER BY LAZARUS, J.:                 FILED NOVEMBER 17, 2015
    Russell Wesley Moss appeals from the order of the Court of Common
    Pleas of Delaware County that dismissed without prejudice his third petition
    filed pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act.1   After careful review, we
    affirm.
    On September 23, 203, following Moss’ guilty plea, the trial court
    sentenced him to 8-20 years’ incarceration for third-degree murder and a
    concurrent term of 5-10 years’ incarceration for solicitation to commit
    murder.     This Court affirmed the judgment of sentence on February 28,
    2005.
    ____________________________________________
    1
    42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541-9546.
    J-S60023-15
    Moss filed a timely PCRA petition, which the court dismissed on
    December 28, 2006. This Court affirmed on October 11, 2007.
    Moss filed his second PCRA petition on July 21, 2014.         The court
    dismissed the petition on October 8, 2014. Moss filed a timely appeal to this
    Court.   Commonwealth v. Moss, No. 3605 EDA 2015 (filed October 20,
    2014). The appeal is pending disposition.
    On April 20, 2015, Moss filed a third PCRA petition, which the court
    dismissed without prejudice on April 27, 2015. Moss filed an appeal to this
    Court on May 18, 2015.
    In Commonwealth v. Lark, 
    746 A.2d 585
    , 588 (Pa. 2000), our
    Supreme Court held:
    When an appellant’s PCRA appeal is pending before a court, a
    subsequent PCRA petition cannot be filed until the resolution of
    review of the pending PCRA petition by the highest state court in
    which review is sought, or upon the expiration of the time for
    seeking such review.
    Accordingly, in light of the pending PCRA petition, the court did not err
    when it dismissed Moss’ third PCRA petition without prejudice.
    Order affirmed.
    Judgment Entered.
    Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.
    Prothonotary
    Date: 11/17/2015
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 1463 EDA 2015

Filed Date: 11/17/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/17/2015