in Re R. Wayne Johnson, Relator ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                                    In The
    Court of Appeals
    Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
    No. 07-16-00354-CV
    IN RE R. WAYNE JOHNSON, RELATOR
    ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    November 1, 2016
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.
    Relator R. Wayne Johnson, a Texas prison inmate appearing pro se, filed a
    petition for writ of mandamus that appears to seek relief against the Honorable Nancy
    Tanner, County Judge of Potter County, Texas.1          Johnson did not accompany his
    petition with the required filing fee or proof of indigence and the materials required by
    Chapter 14 of the Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code.
    By letter of October 14, 2016, we directed Johnson to pay the filing fee or file an
    affidavit of indigence, and if indigent, to comply with Chapter 14 by filing an affidavit
    1
    Johnson’s petition does not make us aware whether it relates to a proceeding in
    Judge Tanner’s court. The petition does not include an order issued by Judge Tanner or
    otherwise indicate any action taken by the Potter County Court.
    describing his previous filings and a certified copy of his inmate trust account. TEX. CIV.
    PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 14.002 (West Supp. 2016) (stating Chapter 14 applies to
    original proceedings brought by an inmate in an appellate court). The letter further
    notified Johnson that the proceeding would be subject to dismissal without further
    notice, should he fail to comply by October 24. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).
    Johnson neither paid the filing fee nor submitted the materials necessary to
    proceed under Chapter 14. Instead, he filed a response summarily arguing that his
    complaint against respondent is a criminal law matter not subject to Chapter 14.
    Johnson did not support his contention with authority or facts shown by a proper
    mandamus record. We find no merit to his response. Accordingly, Johnson’s petition
    for writ of mandamus is dismissed. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).
    Per Curiam
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-16-00354-CV

Filed Date: 11/1/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/2/2016